Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions pub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swingler George, Williams Katrina, Hartling Lisa, Moyer Virginia, Wiebe Natasha, Cramer Kristie, Klassen Terry P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-09-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/5/38
id doaj-95e8e454a8be437d8ab4b6cf4b117161
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95e8e454a8be437d8ab4b6cf4b1171612020-11-25T00:05:40ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312005-09-01513810.1186/1471-2431-5-38Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence synthesesSwingler GeorgeWilliams KatrinaHartling LisaMoyer VirginiaWiebe NatashaCramer KristieKlassen Terry P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR); and ii) determine when effect sizes for the same drug interventions differ between children and adults.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We systematically identified all of the reviews relevant to child health in the CDSR 2002, Issue 4. Reviews were included if they investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of a drug intervention for a condition that occurs in both children and adults. Information was extracted on review characteristics including study methods, results, and conclusions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From 1496 systematic reviews, 408 (27%) were identified as relevant to both adult and child health; 52% (213) of these included data from children. No significant differences were found in effect sizes between adults and children for any of the drug interventions or conditions investigated. However, all of the comparisons lacked the power to detect a clinically significant difference and wide confidence intervals suggest important differences cannot be excluded. A large amount of data was unavailable due to inadequate reporting at the trial and systematic review level.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall, the findings of this study indicate there is a paucity of child-relevant and specific evidence generated from evidence syntheses of drug interventions. The results indicate a need for a higher standard of reporting for participant populations in studies of drug interventions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/5/38
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Swingler George
Williams Katrina
Hartling Lisa
Moyer Virginia
Wiebe Natasha
Cramer Kristie
Klassen Terry P
spellingShingle Swingler George
Williams Katrina
Hartling Lisa
Moyer Virginia
Wiebe Natasha
Cramer Kristie
Klassen Terry P
Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
BMC Pediatrics
author_facet Swingler George
Williams Katrina
Hartling Lisa
Moyer Virginia
Wiebe Natasha
Cramer Kristie
Klassen Terry P
author_sort Swingler George
title Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
title_short Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
title_full Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
title_fullStr Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
title_full_unstemmed Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
title_sort children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses
publisher BMC
series BMC Pediatrics
issn 1471-2431
publishDate 2005-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR); and ii) determine when effect sizes for the same drug interventions differ between children and adults.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We systematically identified all of the reviews relevant to child health in the CDSR 2002, Issue 4. Reviews were included if they investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of a drug intervention for a condition that occurs in both children and adults. Information was extracted on review characteristics including study methods, results, and conclusions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From 1496 systematic reviews, 408 (27%) were identified as relevant to both adult and child health; 52% (213) of these included data from children. No significant differences were found in effect sizes between adults and children for any of the drug interventions or conditions investigated. However, all of the comparisons lacked the power to detect a clinically significant difference and wide confidence intervals suggest important differences cannot be excluded. A large amount of data was unavailable due to inadequate reporting at the trial and systematic review level.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Overall, the findings of this study indicate there is a paucity of child-relevant and specific evidence generated from evidence syntheses of drug interventions. The results indicate a need for a higher standard of reporting for participant populations in studies of drug interventions.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/5/38
work_keys_str_mv AT swinglergeorge childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT williamskatrina childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT hartlinglisa childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT moyervirginia childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT wiebenatasha childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT cramerkristie childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
AT klassenterryp childreninreviewsmethodologicalissuesinchildrelevantevidencesyntheses
_version_ 1725424062840176640