Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France

Transnational ties, networks, and mobilities can constitute a social resource for diaspora communities. Resources available as a result of the migration process or transnational ties can potentially become capitalised by diaspora members. Yet, diaspora members cannot automatically capitalise on all...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mari Toivanen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-12-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2328
id doaj-95eb379a633541849aeadc87f944cd1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-95eb379a633541849aeadc87f944cd1e2020-11-24T23:51:55ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032019-12-017424325210.17645/si.v7i4.23281275Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in FranceMari Toivanen0The Swedish School of Social Science, University of Helsinki, FinlandTransnational ties, networks, and mobilities can constitute a social resource for diaspora communities. Resources available as a result of the migration process or transnational ties can potentially become capitalised by diaspora members. Yet, diaspora members cannot automatically capitalise on all transnational networks and ties, and only resources that are mobilisable within particular transnational networks constitute “migrant capital” (Anthias, 2007; Ryan, 2011). Migrants’ children have grown up in “transnational social space,” in a social setting that is embedded with multiple sets of interconnected networks of social relationships, memberships, identities, and mobilities of cross-border character (Levitt, 2009). Little is known on whether such transnational networks function as a mobilisable social resource, i.e., migrant capital, for the second generation. This study focuses on the transnational ties, practices, and mobilities of second-generation Kurds in France and examines whether those constitute a mobilisable resource for them. It specifically asks if second-generation members intent to or have capitalised on such resources in the transnational social space. The study sheds light on the workings of transnational resources in the lives of the second generation and asks about the extent to which they can be considered migrant capital. The analysis draws from a qualitative dataset such as interviews and observations collected with second-generation Kurds in France.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2328diasporafrancekurdishmigrant capitalsecond generationtransnationalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mari Toivanen
spellingShingle Mari Toivanen
Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
Social Inclusion
diaspora
france
kurdish
migrant capital
second generation
transnationalism
author_facet Mari Toivanen
author_sort Mari Toivanen
title Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
title_short Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
title_full Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
title_fullStr Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
title_full_unstemmed Second Generation and Migrant Capital in the Transnational Space: The Case of Young Kurds in France
title_sort second generation and migrant capital in the transnational space: the case of young kurds in france
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Transnational ties, networks, and mobilities can constitute a social resource for diaspora communities. Resources available as a result of the migration process or transnational ties can potentially become capitalised by diaspora members. Yet, diaspora members cannot automatically capitalise on all transnational networks and ties, and only resources that are mobilisable within particular transnational networks constitute “migrant capital” (Anthias, 2007; Ryan, 2011). Migrants’ children have grown up in “transnational social space,” in a social setting that is embedded with multiple sets of interconnected networks of social relationships, memberships, identities, and mobilities of cross-border character (Levitt, 2009). Little is known on whether such transnational networks function as a mobilisable social resource, i.e., migrant capital, for the second generation. This study focuses on the transnational ties, practices, and mobilities of second-generation Kurds in France and examines whether those constitute a mobilisable resource for them. It specifically asks if second-generation members intent to or have capitalised on such resources in the transnational social space. The study sheds light on the workings of transnational resources in the lives of the second generation and asks about the extent to which they can be considered migrant capital. The analysis draws from a qualitative dataset such as interviews and observations collected with second-generation Kurds in France.
topic diaspora
france
kurdish
migrant capital
second generation
transnationalism
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/2328
work_keys_str_mv AT maritoivanen secondgenerationandmigrantcapitalinthetransnationalspacethecaseofyoungkurdsinfrance
_version_ 1725475547250688000