The quality of surgical versus non-surgical randomized controlled trials
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of surgical interventions are often more difficult to conduct, and their quality may lag behind other trials. Objectives: To compare quality domains in trials of surgical interventions, to a previously reported control sample of general medical trials...
Main Authors: | Sam Adie, Ian A. Harris, Justine M. Naylor, Rajat Mittal |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865416300497 |
Similar Items
-
Factors affecting patient participation in orthopaedic trials comparing surgery to non-surgical interventions
by: Rajat Mittal, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Outcome Reporting in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials
by: Glen, Peter
Published: (2016) -
An Empirical Study of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials and Non-randomized Studies of Surgical Interventions
by: Sandhu, Lakhbir
Published: (2013) -
An Empirical Study of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials and Non-randomized Studies of Surgical Interventions
by: Sandhu, Lakhbir
Published: (2013) -
Pulsed radiofrequency or anterior neurectomy for anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) (the PULSE trial): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
by: Robbert C. Maatman, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)