BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions

This article presents an analysis of the outcomes of the tenth anniversary BRICS summit that took place in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the meetings of ministers of BRICS countries. The achievements of the ministerial meetings and the main summit were analyzed taking into account such parameters...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexander Alexandrovich Ignatov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2019-12-01
Series:Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20854/16818
id doaj-965d1cec980f456aba7338b97bb6e08a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-965d1cec980f456aba7338b97bb6e08a2020-11-25T02:33:52ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)Vestnik RUDN International Relations2313-06602313-06792019-12-01191899910.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-89-9917478BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer DecisionsAlexander Alexandrovich Ignatov0The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationThis article presents an analysis of the outcomes of the tenth anniversary BRICS summit that took place in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the meetings of ministers of BRICS countries. The achievements of the ministerial meetings and the main summit were analyzed taking into account such parameters as the implementation of the priorities of the host country; ensuring continuity of the BRICS agenda; launching new initiatives and making decisions that are in line with the interests of the host country and BRICS partners. Beyond that, the article presents analysis of distribution of the functions of global governance (“Discussion”, “Decision making”, “Direction setting”, “Delivery”) and issues of the global governance by the number of symbols used in the texts of the Johannesburg declaration and the documents agreed during ministerial meetings. The author used the method of content analysis when reviewing the strategic documents of South Africa on issues of national development and the documents agreed during the ministerial meetings and the summit in Johannesburg, and the method of historical analysis when determining impact of South Africa on the BRICS agenda and success of the chairmanship. South Africa as the BRICS chair country preserved continuity over the key issues of the agenda (macroeconomic policy, cooperation in humanitarian sphere, etc.). Security issues were not fully developed, although they were put on the priority list by the chair country. Decisions made at the summit in Johannesburg and during the ministerial meetings result in creation of new working mechanisms (PartNIR, BRICS Vaccine Development and Research Center, etc.) that meet the current global challenges and match the interests of the parties. Nevertheless, the share of “Decision making” function decreased significantly against the background of the growing number of “Deliberation” function in the documents that were analyzed, which indicates a divergence of interests of the parties on a number of issues under discussion.http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20854/16818BRICSSouth Africaglobal governanceJohannesburg summitchairmanship priorities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Alexandrovich Ignatov
spellingShingle Alexander Alexandrovich Ignatov
BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
BRICS
South Africa
global governance
Johannesburg summit
chairmanship priorities
author_facet Alexander Alexandrovich Ignatov
author_sort Alexander Alexandrovich Ignatov
title BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
title_short BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
title_full BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
title_fullStr BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
title_full_unstemmed BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions
title_sort brics summit in johannesburg: more instruments and fewer decisions
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series Vestnik RUDN International Relations
issn 2313-0660
2313-0679
publishDate 2019-12-01
description This article presents an analysis of the outcomes of the tenth anniversary BRICS summit that took place in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the meetings of ministers of BRICS countries. The achievements of the ministerial meetings and the main summit were analyzed taking into account such parameters as the implementation of the priorities of the host country; ensuring continuity of the BRICS agenda; launching new initiatives and making decisions that are in line with the interests of the host country and BRICS partners. Beyond that, the article presents analysis of distribution of the functions of global governance (“Discussion”, “Decision making”, “Direction setting”, “Delivery”) and issues of the global governance by the number of symbols used in the texts of the Johannesburg declaration and the documents agreed during ministerial meetings. The author used the method of content analysis when reviewing the strategic documents of South Africa on issues of national development and the documents agreed during the ministerial meetings and the summit in Johannesburg, and the method of historical analysis when determining impact of South Africa on the BRICS agenda and success of the chairmanship. South Africa as the BRICS chair country preserved continuity over the key issues of the agenda (macroeconomic policy, cooperation in humanitarian sphere, etc.). Security issues were not fully developed, although they were put on the priority list by the chair country. Decisions made at the summit in Johannesburg and during the ministerial meetings result in creation of new working mechanisms (PartNIR, BRICS Vaccine Development and Research Center, etc.) that meet the current global challenges and match the interests of the parties. Nevertheless, the share of “Decision making” function decreased significantly against the background of the growing number of “Deliberation” function in the documents that were analyzed, which indicates a divergence of interests of the parties on a number of issues under discussion.
topic BRICS
South Africa
global governance
Johannesburg summit
chairmanship priorities
url http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20854/16818
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderalexandrovichignatov bricssummitinjohannesburgmoreinstrumentsandfewerdecisions
_version_ 1724811919442837504