Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia

Enumeration, the ability to report an amount of elements, differs as a function of range. Subitizing (quantities 1–4) is an accurate and quick process with reaction times (RTs) minimally affected by the number of presented elements within its range. In the counting range (range of 5–9 elements), RTs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yarden Gliksman, Avishai Henik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/55
id doaj-9677475b427143ee8d66317aa4d88be5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9677475b427143ee8d66317aa4d88be52020-11-25T01:23:59ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202019-02-012110.5334/joc.5553Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental DyscalculiaYarden Gliksman0Avishai Henik1Department of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-ShevaDepartment of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-ShevaEnumeration, the ability to report an amount of elements, differs as a function of range. Subitizing (quantities 1–4) is an accurate and quick process with reaction times (RTs) minimally affected by the number of presented elements within its range. In the counting range (range of 5–9 elements), RTs increase linearly. Subitizing was considered to be a pre-attentive process for many years. However, recently we found that subitizing could be facilitated by improving engagement of attention. Specifically, brief alerting cues increase attentional engagement and reduced RTs in the subitizing range. Moreover, previous studies found that students with developmental dyscalculia (DD) have a smaller than normal subitizing range (3 vs. 4) and their alerting attentional system is impaired. In the current study, we explored whether an alerting cue would increase the subitizing range of adults suffering from DD from 3 to 4. For controls, alerting increased accuracy rates and facilitated enumeration of quantities only in the subitizing range. Participants with DD presented a larger alerting effect; an alerting cue enhanced their RTs in all ranges, but did not increase their smaller than normal subitizing range or accuracy. Our results suggest that both domain-general and domain-specific abilities contribute to the mechanism of enumeration and related to developmental dyscalculia.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/55AttentionNumerical cognitionSpatial cognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yarden Gliksman
Avishai Henik
spellingShingle Yarden Gliksman
Avishai Henik
Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
Journal of Cognition
Attention
Numerical cognition
Spatial cognition
author_facet Yarden Gliksman
Avishai Henik
author_sort Yarden Gliksman
title Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
title_short Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
title_full Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
title_fullStr Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
title_full_unstemmed Enumeration and Alertness in Developmental Dyscalculia
title_sort enumeration and alertness in developmental dyscalculia
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Enumeration, the ability to report an amount of elements, differs as a function of range. Subitizing (quantities 1–4) is an accurate and quick process with reaction times (RTs) minimally affected by the number of presented elements within its range. In the counting range (range of 5–9 elements), RTs increase linearly. Subitizing was considered to be a pre-attentive process for many years. However, recently we found that subitizing could be facilitated by improving engagement of attention. Specifically, brief alerting cues increase attentional engagement and reduced RTs in the subitizing range. Moreover, previous studies found that students with developmental dyscalculia (DD) have a smaller than normal subitizing range (3 vs. 4) and their alerting attentional system is impaired. In the current study, we explored whether an alerting cue would increase the subitizing range of adults suffering from DD from 3 to 4. For controls, alerting increased accuracy rates and facilitated enumeration of quantities only in the subitizing range. Participants with DD presented a larger alerting effect; an alerting cue enhanced their RTs in all ranges, but did not increase their smaller than normal subitizing range or accuracy. Our results suggest that both domain-general and domain-specific abilities contribute to the mechanism of enumeration and related to developmental dyscalculia.
topic Attention
Numerical cognition
Spatial cognition
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/55
work_keys_str_mv AT yardengliksman enumerationandalertnessindevelopmentaldyscalculia
AT avishaihenik enumerationandalertnessindevelopmentaldyscalculia
_version_ 1725119632321282048