Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing

In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irene Korstjens, Albine Moser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:European Journal of General Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
id doaj-968a07ffe3ba48379145d4af67ddf6d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-968a07ffe3ba48379145d4af67ddf6d22020-11-25T02:34:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of General Practice1381-47881751-14022018-01-0124112012410.1080/13814788.2017.13750921375092Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishingIrene Korstjens0Albine Moser1Zuyd University of Applied SciencesZuyd University of Applied SciencesIn the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By ‘novice’ we mean Master’s students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092General practice/family medicinegeneralqualitative designs and methodstrustworthinessreflexivitypublishing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Irene Korstjens
Albine Moser
spellingShingle Irene Korstjens
Albine Moser
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
European Journal of General Practice
General practice/family medicine
general
qualitative designs and methods
trustworthiness
reflexivity
publishing
author_facet Irene Korstjens
Albine Moser
author_sort Irene Korstjens
title Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
title_short Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
title_full Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
title_fullStr Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
title_full_unstemmed Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing
title_sort series: practical guidance to qualitative research. part 4: trustworthiness and publishing
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series European Journal of General Practice
issn 1381-4788
1751-1402
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In the course of our supervisory work over the years we have noticed that qualitative research tends to evoke a lot of questions and worries, so-called frequently asked questions (FAQs). This series of four articles intends to provide novice researchers with practical guidance for conducting high-quality qualitative research in primary care. By ‘novice’ we mean Master’s students and junior researchers, as well as experienced quantitative researchers who are engaging in qualitative research for the first time. This series addresses their questions and provides researchers, readers, reviewers and editors with references to criteria and tools for judging the quality of qualitative research papers. The first article provides an introduction to this series. The second article focused on context, research questions and designs. The third article focused on sampling, data collection and analysis. This fourth article addresses FAQs about trustworthiness and publishing. Quality criteria for all qualitative research are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Reflexivity is an integral part of ensuring the transparency and quality of qualitative research. Writing a qualitative research article reflects the iterative nature of the qualitative research process: data analysis continues while writing. A qualitative research article is mostly narrative and tends to be longer than a quantitative paper, and sometimes requires a different structure. Editors essentially use the criteria: is it new, is it true, is it relevant? An effective cover letter enhances confidence in the newness, trueness and relevance, and explains why your study required a qualitative design. It provides information about the way you applied quality criteria or a checklist, and you can attach the checklist to the manuscript.
topic General practice/family medicine
general
qualitative designs and methods
trustworthiness
reflexivity
publishing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
work_keys_str_mv AT irenekorstjens seriespracticalguidancetoqualitativeresearchpart4trustworthinessandpublishing
AT albinemoser seriespracticalguidancetoqualitativeresearchpart4trustworthinessandpublishing
_version_ 1724809436949643264