Do Extreme Values of Daily-Life Gait Characteristics Provide More Information About Fall Risk Than Median Values?

• Main Authors: Rispens, Sietse M, van Schooten, Kimberley S, Pijnappels, Mirjam, Daffertshofer, Andreas, Beek, Peter J, van Dieën, Jaap H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: JMIR Publications 2015-01-01
• Series: JMIR Research Protocols
• Online Access: http://www.researchprotocols.org/2015/1/e4/

BackgroundGait characteristics estimated from daily-life trunk accelerations reflect gait quality and are associated with fall incidence in older adults. While associations are based on median values of these gait characteristics, their extreme values may reflect either high-risk situations or steady-state gait and may thus be more informative in relation to fall risk. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to improve fall-risk prediction models by examining whether the use of extreme values strengthens the associations with falls. MethodsTrunk acceleration data (Dynaport MoveMonitor) were collected from 202 older adults over a full week. From all walking episodes, we estimated the median and, as reliable estimates of the extremes, the 10th and 90th percentiles of gait characteristics, all over 10-second epochs. In addition, the amount of daily activities was derived from the acceleration data, and participants completed fall-risk questionnaires. Participants were classified as fallers based on one or more falls during 6 months of follow-up. Univariate analyses were performed to investigate whether associations with falls were stronger for the extremes than for the medians. Subsequently, three fall-risk models were compared: (1) using questionnaire data only, (2) adding the amount of activities and medians of gait characteristics, and (3) using extreme values instead of medians in the case of stronger univariate associations of the extremes. ResultsStronger associations were found for the extreme characteristics reflecting high regularity, low frequency variability, and low local instability in anterior-posterior direction, for high symmetry in all directions and for low entropy in anterior-posterior and vertical directions. The questionnaire-only model improved significantly by adding activities and gait characteristics’ medians. Replacing medians by extremes with stronger associations did improve the fall prediction model, but not significantly. ConclusionsAssociations were stronger for extreme values, indicating “high gait quality” situations (ie, 10th and 90th percentiles in case of positive and negative associations, respectively) and not for “low gait quality” situations. This suggests that gait characteristics during optimal performance gait provide more information about the risk of falling than high-risk situations. However, their added value over medians in prediction is limited.