Breaking the Binary

The need to make higher education curricula gender-inclusive is increasingly pressing as student cohorts diversify. We adopted a student-staff partnership approach to design, integrate, and evaluate a module that taught first-year science students the difference between biological sex, gender ident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucy Mercer-Mapstone, Sarah Bajan, Kasia Banas, Arthur Morphett, Kristine McGrath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2021-09-01
Series:Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71538
id doaj-969909d7c0454dabb4f6379f9cc8434f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-969909d7c0454dabb4f6379f9cc8434f2021-09-14T15:49:06ZengUniversity of CalgaryTeaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal2167-47792167-47872021-09-019210.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.6Breaking the BinaryLucy Mercer-Mapstone0Sarah Bajan1Kasia Banas2Arthur Morphett3Kristine McGrath4University of SydneyUniversity of the Sunshine CoastUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of Technology SydneyUniversity of Technology Sydney The need to make higher education curricula gender-inclusive is increasingly pressing as student cohorts diversify. We adopted a student-staff partnership approach to design, integrate, and evaluate a module that taught first-year science students the difference between biological sex, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation in the context of genetics concepts at an Australian university. This module aimed to break the binary in misconceptions of both sex and gender, emphasising that both exist on separate spectra. Data triangulation was used to evaluate students’ attitudes towards the module and their learning of module concepts. Students’ attitudes were positive overall, and evaluation of students’ learning indicated that the majority of students understood and retained key concepts, while also identifying common misconceptions. Perhaps the most important finding was that students who identified as belonging to a minority group had significantly more positive attitudes towards the module than non-minority students. This finding supports previous research that has found inclusive curricula have greater benefit for students from minority backgrounds, indicating the importance of making such curriculum enhancements. Our results speak to both the co-creation process and students’ learning outcomes, providing valuable insights for practitioners both within science and beyond. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71538genderundergraduatebiologyinclusion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucy Mercer-Mapstone
Sarah Bajan
Kasia Banas
Arthur Morphett
Kristine McGrath
spellingShingle Lucy Mercer-Mapstone
Sarah Bajan
Kasia Banas
Arthur Morphett
Kristine McGrath
Breaking the Binary
Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
gender
undergraduate
biology
inclusion
author_facet Lucy Mercer-Mapstone
Sarah Bajan
Kasia Banas
Arthur Morphett
Kristine McGrath
author_sort Lucy Mercer-Mapstone
title Breaking the Binary
title_short Breaking the Binary
title_full Breaking the Binary
title_fullStr Breaking the Binary
title_full_unstemmed Breaking the Binary
title_sort breaking the binary
publisher University of Calgary
series Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal
issn 2167-4779
2167-4787
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The need to make higher education curricula gender-inclusive is increasingly pressing as student cohorts diversify. We adopted a student-staff partnership approach to design, integrate, and evaluate a module that taught first-year science students the difference between biological sex, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation in the context of genetics concepts at an Australian university. This module aimed to break the binary in misconceptions of both sex and gender, emphasising that both exist on separate spectra. Data triangulation was used to evaluate students’ attitudes towards the module and their learning of module concepts. Students’ attitudes were positive overall, and evaluation of students’ learning indicated that the majority of students understood and retained key concepts, while also identifying common misconceptions. Perhaps the most important finding was that students who identified as belonging to a minority group had significantly more positive attitudes towards the module than non-minority students. This finding supports previous research that has found inclusive curricula have greater benefit for students from minority backgrounds, indicating the importance of making such curriculum enhancements. Our results speak to both the co-creation process and students’ learning outcomes, providing valuable insights for practitioners both within science and beyond.
topic gender
undergraduate
biology
inclusion
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/71538
work_keys_str_mv AT lucymercermapstone breakingthebinary
AT sarahbajan breakingthebinary
AT kasiabanas breakingthebinary
AT arthurmorphett breakingthebinary
AT kristinemcgrath breakingthebinary
_version_ 1717379667940343808