Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction Insulin is the most effective antihyperglycemic treatment and basal insulin is the preferred initial formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, its effects are dose-dependent, so adequate titration is necessary to reach targets. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Castellana, Filippo Procino, Rodolfo Sardone, Gianluigi Giannelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-01
Series:BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
Online Access:https://drc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001477.full
id doaj-96e492def2904ec6a45e69827af9733b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96e492def2904ec6a45e69827af9733b2021-06-10T10:06:17ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care2052-48972020-04-018110.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001477Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsMarco Castellana0Filippo Procino1Rodolfo Sardone2Gianluigi Giannelli3Population Health Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology 'Saverio de Bellis', Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, ItalyPopulation Health Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology 'Saverio de Bellis', Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, ItalyPopulation Health Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology 'Saverio de Bellis', Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, ItalyScientific Direction, National Institute of Gastroenterology 'Saverio de Bellis', Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, ItalyIntroduction Insulin is the most effective antihyperglycemic treatment and basal insulin is the preferred initial formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, its effects are dose-dependent, so adequate titration is necessary to reach targets. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.Research design and methods Four databases were searched from database inception through March 2020. Randomized controlled studies with at least 12 weeks of follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes allocated to patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin were selected. Data on glycemic endpoints (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hypoglycemia) and other outcomes (insulin dose, body weight, patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, rescue medication, discontinuation) were extracted. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.Results Six studies evaluating 12 409 patients were finally included. Compared with the physician-led performance, patient-led titration was associated with a statistically significant higher basal insulin dose (+6 IU/day), leading to benefits on HbA1c (−0.1%) and FPG (−5 mg/dL), despite a higher risk of any level hypoglycemia (relative risk=1.1) and a slight increase in body weight (+0.2 kg). No difference was found for the other outcomes.Conclusions The present study showed that patient-led titration of basal insulin was not inferior to physician-led titration in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Therefore, diabetes self-management education and support programs on basal insulin should be widely adopted in clinical practice and patients provided with tools to self-adjust their dose when necessary.https://drc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001477.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Castellana
Filippo Procino
Rodolfo Sardone
Gianluigi Giannelli
spellingShingle Marco Castellana
Filippo Procino
Rodolfo Sardone
Gianluigi Giannelli
Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
author_facet Marco Castellana
Filippo Procino
Rodolfo Sardone
Gianluigi Giannelli
author_sort Marco Castellana
title Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
issn 2052-4897
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Introduction Insulin is the most effective antihyperglycemic treatment and basal insulin is the preferred initial formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, its effects are dose-dependent, so adequate titration is necessary to reach targets. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.Research design and methods Four databases were searched from database inception through March 2020. Randomized controlled studies with at least 12 weeks of follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes allocated to patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin were selected. Data on glycemic endpoints (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hypoglycemia) and other outcomes (insulin dose, body weight, patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, rescue medication, discontinuation) were extracted. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.Results Six studies evaluating 12 409 patients were finally included. Compared with the physician-led performance, patient-led titration was associated with a statistically significant higher basal insulin dose (+6 IU/day), leading to benefits on HbA1c (−0.1%) and FPG (−5 mg/dL), despite a higher risk of any level hypoglycemia (relative risk=1.1) and a slight increase in body weight (+0.2 kg). No difference was found for the other outcomes.Conclusions The present study showed that patient-led titration of basal insulin was not inferior to physician-led titration in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Therefore, diabetes self-management education and support programs on basal insulin should be widely adopted in clinical practice and patients provided with tools to self-adjust their dose when necessary.
url https://drc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001477.full
work_keys_str_mv AT marcocastellana efficacyandsafetyofpatientledversusphysicianledtitrationofbasalinsulininpatientswithuncontrolledtype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT filippoprocino efficacyandsafetyofpatientledversusphysicianledtitrationofbasalinsulininpatientswithuncontrolledtype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rodolfosardone efficacyandsafetyofpatientledversusphysicianledtitrationofbasalinsulininpatientswithuncontrolledtype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT gianluigigiannelli efficacyandsafetyofpatientledversusphysicianledtitrationofbasalinsulininpatientswithuncontrolledtype2diabetesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1721385166101807104