An Update on Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Production

• Main Author: Ryan J. Mailloux
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
• Series: Antioxidants
• Subjects: mitochondria; reactive oxygen species; bioenergetics; hydrogen peroxide; sex differences; substrate preferences
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/9/6/472

Mitochondria are quantifiably the most important sources of superoxide (O₂^●⁻) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in mammalian cells. The overproduction of these molecules has been studied mostly in the contexts of the pathogenesis of human diseases and aging. However, controlled bursts in mitochondrial ROS production, most notably H₂O₂, also plays a vital role in the transmission of cellular information. Striking a balance between utilizing H₂O₂ in second messaging whilst avoiding its deleterious effects requires the use of sophisticated feedback control and H₂O₂ degrading mechanisms. Mitochondria are enriched with H₂O₂ degrading enzymes to desensitize redox signals. These organelles also use a series of negative feedback loops, such as proton leaks or protein <i>S</i>-glutathionylation, to inhibit H₂O₂ production. Understanding how mitochondria produce ROS is also important for comprehending how these organelles use H₂O₂ in eustress signaling. Indeed, twelve different enzymes associated with nutrient metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) can serve as important ROS sources. This includes several flavoproteins and respiratory complexes I-III. Progress in understanding how mitochondria generate H₂O₂ for signaling must also account for critical physiological factors that strongly influence ROS production, such as sex differences and genetic variances in genes encoding antioxidants and proteins involved in mitochondrial bioenergetics. In the present review, I provide an updated view on how mitochondria budget cellular H₂O₂ production. These discussions will focus on the potential addition of two acyl-CoA dehydrogenases to the list of ROS generators and the impact of important phenotypic and physiological factors such as tissue type, mouse strain, and sex on production by these individual sites.