Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts
This article adds value to the accounting debate on the different methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts in the current and proposed new accounting pronouncements of the IASB. The paper demonstrates that significant differences exist between the recognition and measure...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2007-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/364 |
id |
doaj-9704a0b0f91946b58291d0f9fdf8b09c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9704a0b0f91946b58291d0f9fdf8b09c2021-02-02T04:24:13ZengAOSISJournal of Economic and Financial Sciences1995-70762312-28032007-10-011212314010.4102/jef.v1i2.364305Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contractsDaniël Coetsee0Department of Accounting, University of JohannesburgThis article adds value to the accounting debate on the different methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts in the current and proposed new accounting pronouncements of the IASB. The paper demonstrates that significant differences exist between the recognition and measurements of non-financial contracts in terms of the traditional accrual basis of accounting and financial contracts in terms of the so-called contractual basis of accounting applied for financial instruments, even though the accounting for financial instruments is seen as an extension of the traditional accrual basis of accounting. The current IASB’s projects on liabilities, revenue recognition and the conceptual framework seem to eliminate certain differences between the two methodologies, but also raise new issues on the debate of the methodologies to account for financial and non-financial contracts.https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/364accounting of contractsaccrual basiscontractual basisexecutory contractsfinancial instrumentsmeasurementperformance basisrecognitionrights and obligations |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniël Coetsee |
spellingShingle |
Daniël Coetsee Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences accounting of contracts accrual basis contractual basis executory contracts financial instruments measurement performance basis recognition rights and obligations |
author_facet |
Daniël Coetsee |
author_sort |
Daniël Coetsee |
title |
Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
title_short |
Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
title_full |
Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
title_fullStr |
Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
title_sort |
debating the methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences |
issn |
1995-7076 2312-2803 |
publishDate |
2007-10-01 |
description |
This article adds value to the accounting debate on the different methodologies of accounting for financial and non-financial contracts in the current and proposed new accounting pronouncements of the IASB. The paper demonstrates that significant differences exist between the recognition and measurements of non-financial contracts in terms of the traditional accrual basis of accounting and financial contracts in terms of the so-called contractual basis of accounting applied for financial instruments, even though the accounting for financial instruments is seen as an extension of the traditional accrual basis of accounting. The current IASB’s projects on liabilities, revenue recognition and the conceptual framework seem to eliminate certain differences between the two methodologies, but also raise new issues on the debate of the methodologies to account for financial and non-financial contracts. |
topic |
accounting of contracts accrual basis contractual basis executory contracts financial instruments measurement performance basis recognition rights and obligations |
url |
https://jefjournal.org.za/index.php/jef/article/view/364 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielcoetsee debatingthemethodologiesofaccountingforfinancialandnonfinancialcontracts |
_version_ |
1724305858642313216 |