Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?

Background: Laparoscopic resection (LR) offers significant advantages compared to open resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate whether LR outcomes jeopardised short and long-term outcomes of patients with large GISTs. Patients and Methods: Among 50 patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beatrice Ulloa Severino, David Fuks, Panagiotis Lainas, Antoine Blain, Pierre Validire, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Thierry Perniceni, Brice Gayet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2016;volume=12;issue=2;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=Severino
id doaj-9705b01e841f43e08628aaf7447cdac7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9705b01e841f43e08628aaf7447cdac72020-11-24T23:25:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212016-01-0112214815310.4103/0972-9941.169955Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?Beatrice Ulloa SeverinoDavid FuksPanagiotis LainasAntoine BlainPierre ValidireJean-Marc FerrazThierry PerniceniBrice GayetBackground: Laparoscopic resection (LR) offers significant advantages compared to open resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate whether LR outcomes jeopardised short and long-term outcomes of patients with large GISTs. Patients and Methods: Among 50 patients undergoing surgery for gastric GISTs, 12 underwent LR for large GISTs (>5 cm). Their characteristics, perioperative results and survival were retrospectively compared to those of 22 patients who underwent LR for 'small GIST'. Results: The two groups were similar regarding demographics, rate of wedge resection and mean blood loss. No patient required transfusion or conversion. Operative time was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (160 min vs 112 min, P = 0.001). Mean tumour size was significantly lower in the 'small GIST' group (8.4 cm vs 2.4 cm, P = 0.0001). Resection margins were negative. The mortality rate was nil and the overall morbidity rates was similar in both groups. Median length of hospital stay was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (7 days vs 5 days, P = 0.004). Median follow-up was 47 months and one patient in the 'small GIST' group developed recurrence and died during follow-up 11 years after surgery. No patient died during follow-up. Conclusions: LR for large GISTs is safe and technically feasible and does not negatively influence the oncologic course. Prospective randomised trials should be performed before using this approach in routine surgical care.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2016;volume=12;issue=2;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=SeverinoGastrectomygastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)laparoscopyresection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beatrice Ulloa Severino
David Fuks
Panagiotis Lainas
Antoine Blain
Pierre Validire
Jean-Marc Ferraz
Thierry Perniceni
Brice Gayet
spellingShingle Beatrice Ulloa Severino
David Fuks
Panagiotis Lainas
Antoine Blain
Pierre Validire
Jean-Marc Ferraz
Thierry Perniceni
Brice Gayet
Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Gastrectomy
gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)
laparoscopy
resection
author_facet Beatrice Ulloa Severino
David Fuks
Panagiotis Lainas
Antoine Blain
Pierre Validire
Jean-Marc Ferraz
Thierry Perniceni
Brice Gayet
author_sort Beatrice Ulloa Severino
title Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
title_short Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
title_full Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
title_fullStr Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
title_full_unstemmed Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: Is laparoscopy reasonable?
title_sort large gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the stomach: is laparoscopy reasonable?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: Laparoscopic resection (LR) offers significant advantages compared to open resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate whether LR outcomes jeopardised short and long-term outcomes of patients with large GISTs. Patients and Methods: Among 50 patients undergoing surgery for gastric GISTs, 12 underwent LR for large GISTs (>5 cm). Their characteristics, perioperative results and survival were retrospectively compared to those of 22 patients who underwent LR for 'small GIST'. Results: The two groups were similar regarding demographics, rate of wedge resection and mean blood loss. No patient required transfusion or conversion. Operative time was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (160 min vs 112 min, P = 0.001). Mean tumour size was significantly lower in the 'small GIST' group (8.4 cm vs 2.4 cm, P = 0.0001). Resection margins were negative. The mortality rate was nil and the overall morbidity rates was similar in both groups. Median length of hospital stay was significantly increased in the 'large GIST' group (7 days vs 5 days, P = 0.004). Median follow-up was 47 months and one patient in the 'small GIST' group developed recurrence and died during follow-up 11 years after surgery. No patient died during follow-up. Conclusions: LR for large GISTs is safe and technically feasible and does not negatively influence the oncologic course. Prospective randomised trials should be performed before using this approach in routine surgical care.
topic Gastrectomy
gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)
laparoscopy
resection
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2016;volume=12;issue=2;spage=148;epage=153;aulast=Severino
work_keys_str_mv AT beatriceulloaseverino largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT davidfuks largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT panagiotislainas largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT antoineblain largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT pierrevalidire largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT jeanmarcferraz largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT thierryperniceni largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
AT bricegayet largegastrointestinalstromaltumoursofthestomachislaparoscopyreasonable
_version_ 1725556924700688384