Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?

Government interference in private property – justifiable from a Christian perspective? A new concept of property was introduced into the South African legal system with the promulgation of the Constitution of South Africa (1996). Many South Africans regard this new notion as an imminent danger to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. van der Schyff
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Scriber Editorial Systems 2003-08-01
Series:Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/337
id doaj-975666597a5342ab9a2edd089a6ea4e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-975666597a5342ab9a2edd089a6ea4e52020-11-25T02:14:02ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85572003-08-01682/310.4102/koers.v68i2/3.337Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?E. van der Schyff0Fakulteit Regte, Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHOGovernment interference in private property – justifiable from a Christian perspective? A new concept of property was introduced into the South African legal system with the promulgation of the Constitution of South Africa (1996). Many South Africans regard this new notion as an imminent danger to the concept of ownership as known in the pre-constitutional era. The aim of this article is to establish whether the new concept of property and the state’s role in regulating property can be justified from a Christian perspective. The author briefly discusses the views of Thomas of Aquino and Hugo de Groot with regard to the individual’s rights to hold private property. Thereafter the new property concept in terms of section 25 of The Constitution, as well as the distinction between expropriation and deprivation is examined. The requirements for expropriation, deprivation and constructive expropriation are discussed with reference to applicable case law. In the conclusion the author considers whether the new property concept is justifiable in the light of the previously discussed Christian perspectives.https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/337DeprivationExpropriationGovernment InferenceProperty JustifiableProperty
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. van der Schyff
spellingShingle E. van der Schyff
Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Deprivation
Expropriation
Government Inference
Property Justifiable
Property
author_facet E. van der Schyff
author_sort E. van der Schyff
title Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
title_short Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
title_full Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
title_fullStr Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
title_full_unstemmed Staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit Christelike perspektief?
title_sort staatsinmenging in privaat-eiendom – verantwoordbaar vanuit christelike perspektief?
publisher Scriber Editorial Systems
series Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
issn 0023-270X
2304-8557
publishDate 2003-08-01
description Government interference in private property – justifiable from a Christian perspective? A new concept of property was introduced into the South African legal system with the promulgation of the Constitution of South Africa (1996). Many South Africans regard this new notion as an imminent danger to the concept of ownership as known in the pre-constitutional era. The aim of this article is to establish whether the new concept of property and the state’s role in regulating property can be justified from a Christian perspective. The author briefly discusses the views of Thomas of Aquino and Hugo de Groot with regard to the individual’s rights to hold private property. Thereafter the new property concept in terms of section 25 of The Constitution, as well as the distinction between expropriation and deprivation is examined. The requirements for expropriation, deprivation and constructive expropriation are discussed with reference to applicable case law. In the conclusion the author considers whether the new property concept is justifiable in the light of the previously discussed Christian perspectives.
topic Deprivation
Expropriation
Government Inference
Property Justifiable
Property
url https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/337
work_keys_str_mv AT evanderschyff staatsinmenginginprivaateiendomverantwoordbaarvanuitchristelikeperspektief
_version_ 1724902366808899584