The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation

Aim: To investigate the effect of bilateral artificially reduced vision on vergence adaptation, in participants with normal binocular single vision. Methods: Seventeen participants were recruited from a student population. The inclusion criteria included the ability to adapt to a 6Δ base-out prism t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pooja S. Bhatt, Alison Y. Firth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2009-08-01
Series:British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/9
id doaj-97704be283ea48b3aae73b9a5d347818
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97704be283ea48b3aae73b9a5d3478182020-11-25T01:23:28ZengWhite Rose University PressBritish and Irish Orthoptic Journal2516-35902009-08-016525510.22599/bioj.98The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptationPooja S. Bhatt0Alison Y. Firth1Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, SheffieldAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, SheffieldAim: To investigate the effect of bilateral artificially reduced vision on vergence adaptation, in participants with normal binocular single vision. Methods: Seventeen participants were recruited from a student population. The inclusion criteria included the ability to adapt to a 6Δ base-out prism to within ±1Δ of the baseline heterophoria  measurement in 10 minutes. The size of the prism-induced heterophoria was measured at the start and end of the adaptation period using a Maddox rod and tangent scale. Eleven participants fitted the inclusion criteria and proceeded to a second visit; involving adaptation to a 6 Δ base-out prism within 10 minutes, whilst vision was bilaterally reduced with Bangerter foils (0.3). Participants who did not demonstrate adaptation to within  ±1Δ of the baseline measure in 10 minutes were given a further 10 minutes to adapt, with the size of the residual deviation being measured at 5-minute intervals. Results: Eight of 11 participants demonstrated vergence adaptation to within ±1 Δ of the baseline measure in 10 minutes when vision was bilaterally reduced. Three participants required an additional 5 minutes before they achieved this level of adaptation. Statistical analysis revealed the rate of vergence adaptation was affected in some participants when vision was bilaterally reduced (p = 0.0260, t = 2.6116, d.f. =10). Conclusion: Individuals who demonstrate vergence adaptation in normal viewing conditions appear capable of doing this with an artificial bilateral reduction in vision. In some participants, a longer period of time is required to vergence-adapt.https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/9Vergence adaptationVisual acuity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pooja S. Bhatt
Alison Y. Firth
spellingShingle Pooja S. Bhatt
Alison Y. Firth
The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
Vergence adaptation
Visual acuity
author_facet Pooja S. Bhatt
Alison Y. Firth
author_sort Pooja S. Bhatt
title The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
title_short The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
title_full The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
title_fullStr The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
title_full_unstemmed The effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
title_sort effect of artificially reduced bilateral visual acuity on vergence adaptation
publisher White Rose University Press
series British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
issn 2516-3590
publishDate 2009-08-01
description Aim: To investigate the effect of bilateral artificially reduced vision on vergence adaptation, in participants with normal binocular single vision. Methods: Seventeen participants were recruited from a student population. The inclusion criteria included the ability to adapt to a 6Δ base-out prism to within ±1Δ of the baseline heterophoria  measurement in 10 minutes. The size of the prism-induced heterophoria was measured at the start and end of the adaptation period using a Maddox rod and tangent scale. Eleven participants fitted the inclusion criteria and proceeded to a second visit; involving adaptation to a 6 Δ base-out prism within 10 minutes, whilst vision was bilaterally reduced with Bangerter foils (0.3). Participants who did not demonstrate adaptation to within  ±1Δ of the baseline measure in 10 minutes were given a further 10 minutes to adapt, with the size of the residual deviation being measured at 5-minute intervals. Results: Eight of 11 participants demonstrated vergence adaptation to within ±1 Δ of the baseline measure in 10 minutes when vision was bilaterally reduced. Three participants required an additional 5 minutes before they achieved this level of adaptation. Statistical analysis revealed the rate of vergence adaptation was affected in some participants when vision was bilaterally reduced (p = 0.0260, t = 2.6116, d.f. =10). Conclusion: Individuals who demonstrate vergence adaptation in normal viewing conditions appear capable of doing this with an artificial bilateral reduction in vision. In some participants, a longer period of time is required to vergence-adapt.
topic Vergence adaptation
Visual acuity
url https://www.bioj-online.com/articles/9
work_keys_str_mv AT poojasbhatt theeffectofartificiallyreducedbilateralvisualacuityonvergenceadaptation
AT alisonyfirth theeffectofartificiallyreducedbilateralvisualacuityonvergenceadaptation
AT poojasbhatt effectofartificiallyreducedbilateralvisualacuityonvergenceadaptation
AT alisonyfirth effectofartificiallyreducedbilateralvisualacuityonvergenceadaptation
_version_ 1725122203474722816