Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background: Paclitaxel-coated balloons (DCB) are suitable to reduce the risk of restenosis after angioplasty of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions. However, numerous types of DCBs are distinguished by drug density and coating. Conflicting evidence exists about the risk of mortality. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christof Klumb, Thomas Lehmann, René Aschenbach, Niklas Eckardt, Ulf Teichgräber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-11-01
Series:EClinicalMedicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019301658
id doaj-97750e7add2d455e929b6d1afc61748c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97750e7add2d455e929b6d1afc61748c2020-11-25T01:35:07ZengElsevierEClinicalMedicine2589-53702019-11-01164250Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsChristof Klumb0Thomas Lehmann1René Aschenbach2Niklas Eckardt3Ulf Teichgräber4Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, GermanyCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Salvador-Allende-Platz 27, 07747 Jena, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany; Corresponding author at: Universitätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.Background: Paclitaxel-coated balloons (DCB) are suitable to reduce the risk of restenosis after angioplasty of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions. However, numerous types of DCBs are distinguished by drug density and coating. Conflicting evidence exists about the risk of mortality. This study sought to evaluate benefit and risk of DCB angioplasty compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Methods: Randomised trials published between January 1, 2005 and February 3, 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Clinical.trials.gov. Studies on DCB versus POBA for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease were included, and those focused on in-stent restenosis or critical limb ischemia were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess the main outcomes of freedom from target lesion revascularisation (FfTLR) and all-cause mortality. Findings: Of 552 identified records, 14 studies including 2504 patients were eligible. DCB significantly increased the risk of FfTLR with substantial heterogeneity (12-month: risk ratio [RR] 1·24 [95% CI 1·14–2·27], I2 = 66%; 24-month RR 1·39 [95% CI 1·39–1·52], I2 = 21%). The risk of 24-month all-cause mortality was increased after DCB (random-effects model: RR 1·53 [95% CI 0·94–2·50], p = 0·09; fixed-effect model: RR 1·74 [95% CI 1·08–2·81], p = 0·02). Interpretation: Efficacy of DCB differs substantially across studies. Effect size depends on the type of DCB, treatment strategy, and lesion complexity. The risk of 2-year all-cause mortality at 2 years was increased, but without evidence of causation. Keywords: Angioplasty, Intermittent claudication, Meta-analysis, Paclitaxel, Peripheral artery diseasehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019301658
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christof Klumb
Thomas Lehmann
René Aschenbach
Niklas Eckardt
Ulf Teichgräber
spellingShingle Christof Klumb
Thomas Lehmann
René Aschenbach
Niklas Eckardt
Ulf Teichgräber
Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
EClinicalMedicine
author_facet Christof Klumb
Thomas Lehmann
René Aschenbach
Niklas Eckardt
Ulf Teichgräber
author_sort Christof Klumb
title Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
publisher Elsevier
series EClinicalMedicine
issn 2589-5370
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Background: Paclitaxel-coated balloons (DCB) are suitable to reduce the risk of restenosis after angioplasty of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions. However, numerous types of DCBs are distinguished by drug density and coating. Conflicting evidence exists about the risk of mortality. This study sought to evaluate benefit and risk of DCB angioplasty compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Methods: Randomised trials published between January 1, 2005 and February 3, 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Clinical.trials.gov. Studies on DCB versus POBA for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease were included, and those focused on in-stent restenosis or critical limb ischemia were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess the main outcomes of freedom from target lesion revascularisation (FfTLR) and all-cause mortality. Findings: Of 552 identified records, 14 studies including 2504 patients were eligible. DCB significantly increased the risk of FfTLR with substantial heterogeneity (12-month: risk ratio [RR] 1·24 [95% CI 1·14–2·27], I2 = 66%; 24-month RR 1·39 [95% CI 1·39–1·52], I2 = 21%). The risk of 24-month all-cause mortality was increased after DCB (random-effects model: RR 1·53 [95% CI 0·94–2·50], p = 0·09; fixed-effect model: RR 1·74 [95% CI 1·08–2·81], p = 0·02). Interpretation: Efficacy of DCB differs substantially across studies. Effect size depends on the type of DCB, treatment strategy, and lesion complexity. The risk of 2-year all-cause mortality at 2 years was increased, but without evidence of causation. Keywords: Angioplasty, Intermittent claudication, Meta-analysis, Paclitaxel, Peripheral artery disease
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537019301658
work_keys_str_mv AT christofklumb benefitandriskfrompaclitaxelcoatedballoonangioplastyforthetreatmentoffemoropoplitealarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT thomaslehmann benefitandriskfrompaclitaxelcoatedballoonangioplastyforthetreatmentoffemoropoplitealarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT reneaschenbach benefitandriskfrompaclitaxelcoatedballoonangioplastyforthetreatmentoffemoropoplitealarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT niklaseckardt benefitandriskfrompaclitaxelcoatedballoonangioplastyforthetreatmentoffemoropoplitealarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT ulfteichgraber benefitandriskfrompaclitaxelcoatedballoonangioplastyforthetreatmentoffemoropoplitealarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725068485091917824