Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams

Research in the area of spatial cognition demonstrated that references to landmarks are essential in the communication and the interpretation of wayfinding instructions for human being. In order to detect landmarks, a model for the assessment of their salience has been previously developed by Raubal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teriitutea Quesnot, Stéphane Roche
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-12-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/4/1/1
id doaj-97d07b2e22fc4b8f949512ecb56ec3c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97d07b2e22fc4b8f949512ecb56ec3c62020-11-25T01:00:19ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642014-12-014113110.3390/ijgi4010001ijgi4010001Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data StreamsTeriitutea Quesnot0Stéphane Roche1Center for Research in Geomatics, Université Laval, 1055 Avenue du Séminaire, Pavillon Louis-Jacques Casault, Québec (QC) G1V 0A6, CanadaCenter for Research in Geomatics, Université Laval, 1055 Avenue du Séminaire, Pavillon Louis-Jacques Casault, Québec (QC) G1V 0A6, CanadaResearch in the area of spatial cognition demonstrated that references to landmarks are essential in the communication and the interpretation of wayfinding instructions for human being. In order to detect landmarks, a model for the assessment of their salience has been previously developed by Raubal and Winter. According to their model, landmark salience is divided into three categories: visual, structural, and semantic. Several solutions have been proposed to automatically detect landmarks on the basis of these categories. Due to a lack of relevant data, semantic salience has been frequently reduced to objects’ historical and cultural significance. Social dimension (i.e., the way an object is practiced and recognized by a person or a group of people) is systematically excluded from the measure of landmark semantic salience even though it represents an important component. Since the advent of mobile Internet and smartphones, the production of geolocated content from social web platforms—also described as geosocial data—became commonplace. Actually, these data allow us to have a better understanding of the local geographic knowledge. Therefore, we argue that geosocial data, especially Social Location Sharing datasets, represent a reliable source of information to precisely measure landmark semantic salience in urban area.http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/4/1/1automatic landmarks detection systemslandmarkslandmark semantic saliencelocalnessonline social networkssocial location sharingwayfinding
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teriitutea Quesnot
Stéphane Roche
spellingShingle Teriitutea Quesnot
Stéphane Roche
Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
automatic landmarks detection systems
landmarks
landmark semantic salience
localness
online social networks
social location sharing
wayfinding
author_facet Teriitutea Quesnot
Stéphane Roche
author_sort Teriitutea Quesnot
title Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
title_short Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
title_full Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
title_fullStr Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
title_full_unstemmed Measure of Landmark Semantic Salience through Geosocial Data Streams
title_sort measure of landmark semantic salience through geosocial data streams
publisher MDPI AG
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
issn 2220-9964
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Research in the area of spatial cognition demonstrated that references to landmarks are essential in the communication and the interpretation of wayfinding instructions for human being. In order to detect landmarks, a model for the assessment of their salience has been previously developed by Raubal and Winter. According to their model, landmark salience is divided into three categories: visual, structural, and semantic. Several solutions have been proposed to automatically detect landmarks on the basis of these categories. Due to a lack of relevant data, semantic salience has been frequently reduced to objects’ historical and cultural significance. Social dimension (i.e., the way an object is practiced and recognized by a person or a group of people) is systematically excluded from the measure of landmark semantic salience even though it represents an important component. Since the advent of mobile Internet and smartphones, the production of geolocated content from social web platforms—also described as geosocial data—became commonplace. Actually, these data allow us to have a better understanding of the local geographic knowledge. Therefore, we argue that geosocial data, especially Social Location Sharing datasets, represent a reliable source of information to precisely measure landmark semantic salience in urban area.
topic automatic landmarks detection systems
landmarks
landmark semantic salience
localness
online social networks
social location sharing
wayfinding
url http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/4/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT teriituteaquesnot measureoflandmarksemanticsaliencethroughgeosocialdatastreams
AT stephaneroche measureoflandmarksemanticsaliencethroughgeosocialdatastreams
_version_ 1725214096017588224