Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension

Background: Tracheal intubation can be associated with considerable hemodynamic changes, particularly in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The GlideScope® video-laryngoscope (GVL) is a novel video laryngoscope that does not need direct exposure of the vocal cords, and it can also produce lowe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majid Dashti, Shahram Amini, Rasoul Azarfarin, Ziae Totonchi, Maryam Hatami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rcvmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2251-9572;year=2014;volume=3;issue=2;spage=4;epage=4;aulast=Dashti;type=0
id doaj-97f936a481e248fa9ae8f38d2840381f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97f936a481e248fa9ae8f38d2840381f2020-11-24T20:56:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsResearch in Cardiovascular Medicine2251-95722251-95802014-01-01324410.5812/cardiovascmed.17598Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertensionMajid DashtiShahram AminiRasoul AzarfarinZiae TotonchiMaryam HatamiBackground: Tracheal intubation can be associated with considerable hemodynamic changes, particularly in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The GlideScope® video-laryngoscope (GVL) is a novel video laryngoscope that does not need direct exposure of the vocal cords, and it can also produce lower hemodynamic changes due to lower degrees of trauma and stimuli to the oropharynx than a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL). Objectives: The aim of this clinical trial was to compare hemodynamic alterations following tracheal intubation with a GVL and MDL in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients who had uncontrolled hypertension and scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were randomly assigned to receive intubated with either a GVL (n = 30) or a MDL (n = 30). Intubation time, heart rate, rate pressure product (RPP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), were compared between the two groups at; baseline, following induction of anesthesia, after intubation, and at one minute intervals for 5 minutes. Results: A total of 59 patients finished the study. Intubation time was longer in the GVL group (9.80 ± 1.27 s) than in the MDL group (8.20 ± 1.17 s) (P < 0.05). MAP, pulse rate, and RPP were lower in the GVL than the MDL group after endotracheal intubation (P < 0.05). MAP, heart rate, and RPP returned to pre-intubation values at 3 and 4 minutes after intubation in the GVL and MDL groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hemodynamic fluctuations in patients with uncontrolled hypertension after endotracheal intubation were lower with the GVL than the MDL technique.http://www.rcvmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2251-9572;year=2014;volume=3;issue=2;spage=4;epage=4;aulast=Dashti;type=0Airway Management; IntubationIntratracheal; Hypertension; Hemodynamics; Laryngoscopes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Majid Dashti
Shahram Amini
Rasoul Azarfarin
Ziae Totonchi
Maryam Hatami
spellingShingle Majid Dashti
Shahram Amini
Rasoul Azarfarin
Ziae Totonchi
Maryam Hatami
Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Airway Management; Intubation
Intratracheal; Hypertension; Hemodynamics; Laryngoscopes
author_facet Majid Dashti
Shahram Amini
Rasoul Azarfarin
Ziae Totonchi
Maryam Hatami
author_sort Majid Dashti
title Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
title_short Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
title_full Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
title_fullStr Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
title_sort hemodynamic changes following endotracheal intubation with glidescope® video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
issn 2251-9572
2251-9580
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: Tracheal intubation can be associated with considerable hemodynamic changes, particularly in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The GlideScope® video-laryngoscope (GVL) is a novel video laryngoscope that does not need direct exposure of the vocal cords, and it can also produce lower hemodynamic changes due to lower degrees of trauma and stimuli to the oropharynx than a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL). Objectives: The aim of this clinical trial was to compare hemodynamic alterations following tracheal intubation with a GVL and MDL in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients who had uncontrolled hypertension and scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation, were randomly assigned to receive intubated with either a GVL (n = 30) or a MDL (n = 30). Intubation time, heart rate, rate pressure product (RPP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), were compared between the two groups at; baseline, following induction of anesthesia, after intubation, and at one minute intervals for 5 minutes. Results: A total of 59 patients finished the study. Intubation time was longer in the GVL group (9.80 ± 1.27 s) than in the MDL group (8.20 ± 1.17 s) (P < 0.05). MAP, pulse rate, and RPP were lower in the GVL than the MDL group after endotracheal intubation (P < 0.05). MAP, heart rate, and RPP returned to pre-intubation values at 3 and 4 minutes after intubation in the GVL and MDL groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hemodynamic fluctuations in patients with uncontrolled hypertension after endotracheal intubation were lower with the GVL than the MDL technique.
topic Airway Management; Intubation
Intratracheal; Hypertension; Hemodynamics; Laryngoscopes
url http://www.rcvmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2251-9572;year=2014;volume=3;issue=2;spage=4;epage=4;aulast=Dashti;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT majiddashti hemodynamicchangesfollowingendotrachealintubationwithglidescopevideolaryngoscopeinpatientswithuntreatedhypertension
AT shahramamini hemodynamicchangesfollowingendotrachealintubationwithglidescopevideolaryngoscopeinpatientswithuntreatedhypertension
AT rasoulazarfarin hemodynamicchangesfollowingendotrachealintubationwithglidescopevideolaryngoscopeinpatientswithuntreatedhypertension
AT ziaetotonchi hemodynamicchangesfollowingendotrachealintubationwithglidescopevideolaryngoscopeinpatientswithuntreatedhypertension
AT maryamhatami hemodynamicchangesfollowingendotrachealintubationwithglidescopevideolaryngoscopeinpatientswithuntreatedhypertension
_version_ 1716790879846400000