A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall

Background: Developmental anomalies of the genitourinary system account for 14–40% irregularities in prenatal sonography, and require greater understanding for pelvic surgery and fertility issues. Aim: This case report describes a 96-year-old formaldehyde-fixed female cadaver observed to have an unu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.G. Sagoo, T.J. Shaw, S. Scandrett, Y. Premakumar, P. Carter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Translational Research in Anatomy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X20300261
id doaj-983f4deb0218491c9c4f992c8e1563b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-983f4deb0218491c9c4f992c8e1563b82021-01-02T05:09:49ZengElsevierTranslational Research in Anatomy2214-854X2021-01-0122100087A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wallM.G. Sagoo0T.J. Shaw1S. Scandrett2Y. Premakumar3P. Carter4Department of Anatomy, School of Centre for Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Corresponding author.Centre for Inflammation Biology & Cancer Immunology, New Hunt's House, Guys Campus, King's College London, United KingdomInstitute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's University of London, United KingdomInstitute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's University of London, United KingdomInstitute for Medical and Biomedical Education, Department of Anatomy, St George's University of London, United KingdomBackground: Developmental anomalies of the genitourinary system account for 14–40% irregularities in prenatal sonography, and require greater understanding for pelvic surgery and fertility issues. Aim: This case report describes a 96-year-old formaldehyde-fixed female cadaver observed to have an unusual conical uterine fundus with a tube-like extension from its fundus to the peritoneal lining of the inside of the anterior abdominal wall. Method and Results: On gross observation, it seemed to be a midline fusion weakness of the uterus. Histological examination revealed similarities of the specimen to uterine histology, but with unusual, potentially pathological features. Conclusion: Thorough literature search, and the histological investigation, we conclude a uterine diverticulum with no scarring or fibrosis. Uterine diverticula are rare anomalies and should be differentiated from sacculations of pregnancy and other pelvic masses.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X20300261Uterine extensionUterine diverticulumMüllerian duct anomalyMüllerian duplicationUterus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M.G. Sagoo
T.J. Shaw
S. Scandrett
Y. Premakumar
P. Carter
spellingShingle M.G. Sagoo
T.J. Shaw
S. Scandrett
Y. Premakumar
P. Carter
A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
Translational Research in Anatomy
Uterine extension
Uterine diverticulum
Müllerian duct anomaly
Müllerian duplication
Uterus
author_facet M.G. Sagoo
T.J. Shaw
S. Scandrett
Y. Premakumar
P. Carter
author_sort M.G. Sagoo
title A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
title_short A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
title_full A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
title_fullStr A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
title_full_unstemmed A case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
title_sort case report of uterine extension from uterine fundus to the anterior abdominal wall
publisher Elsevier
series Translational Research in Anatomy
issn 2214-854X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: Developmental anomalies of the genitourinary system account for 14–40% irregularities in prenatal sonography, and require greater understanding for pelvic surgery and fertility issues. Aim: This case report describes a 96-year-old formaldehyde-fixed female cadaver observed to have an unusual conical uterine fundus with a tube-like extension from its fundus to the peritoneal lining of the inside of the anterior abdominal wall. Method and Results: On gross observation, it seemed to be a midline fusion weakness of the uterus. Histological examination revealed similarities of the specimen to uterine histology, but with unusual, potentially pathological features. Conclusion: Thorough literature search, and the histological investigation, we conclude a uterine diverticulum with no scarring or fibrosis. Uterine diverticula are rare anomalies and should be differentiated from sacculations of pregnancy and other pelvic masses.
topic Uterine extension
Uterine diverticulum
Müllerian duct anomaly
Müllerian duplication
Uterus
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214854X20300261
work_keys_str_mv AT mgsagoo acasereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT tjshaw acasereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT sscandrett acasereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT ypremakumar acasereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT pcarter acasereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT mgsagoo casereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT tjshaw casereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT sscandrett casereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT ypremakumar casereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
AT pcarter casereportofuterineextensionfromuterinefundustotheanteriorabdominalwall
_version_ 1724359581029629952