Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis
Abstract Background To discriminatively evaluate the cost-saving effects of a disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients through care process rectification and, subsequently, improved health outcomes. Methods This study links public medical insurance claims data to the health recor...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05297-0 |
id |
doaj-98643ca757574e869b14aac505cebb2e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-98643ca757574e869b14aac505cebb2e2020-11-25T03:15:33ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-05-0120111010.1186/s12913-020-05297-0Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysisHiroyuki Kawaguchi0Michiko Moriyama1Hideki Hashimoto2Seijo University, Faculty of EconomicsClinical Nursing Research Laboratory, Chronic Care and Family Nursing Unit, Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health SciencesDepartment of Health and Social Behavior, The University of Tokyo, School of Public HealthAbstract Background To discriminatively evaluate the cost-saving effects of a disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients through care process rectification and, subsequently, improved health outcomes. Methods This study links public medical insurance claims data to the health records of a disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients. To account for selection bias caused by the non-randomized allocation of the disease management program for diabetes patients, we adopted a fixed-effect model of panel data analysis. To discriminatively evaluate the cost-saving effects of the disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients through care process rectification and, subsequently, improved health outcomes, we expanded the difference-in-differences analysis from the traditional two-period model to a three-period model, comprising the before-intervention, during-intervention, and after-intervention periods. Data were extracted from municipal public insurers in Kure, Japan. Results The cost-reduction effect in terms of treatment costs from the before-intervention period to the during-intervention period (the rectification effect) was 4.02%, and the cost-saving effect from the during-intervention period to the after-intervention period (the health improvement effect) was 2.95%. Conclusions A disease management program for diabetes patients organized by local public insurers in Japan reduced costs both by amending treatment processes and by subsequently improving the prognosis of the disease.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05297-0Disease managementDiabetesDialysisDifference-in-differences analysisCharlson comorbidity index |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hiroyuki Kawaguchi Michiko Moriyama Hideki Hashimoto |
spellingShingle |
Hiroyuki Kawaguchi Michiko Moriyama Hideki Hashimoto Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis BMC Health Services Research Disease management Diabetes Dialysis Difference-in-differences analysis Charlson comorbidity index |
author_facet |
Hiroyuki Kawaguchi Michiko Moriyama Hideki Hashimoto |
author_sort |
Hiroyuki Kawaguchi |
title |
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
title_short |
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
title_full |
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
title_fullStr |
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? Evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
title_sort |
does disease management for diabetic nephropathy reduce medical expenditure? evidence from a three-period difference-in-differences analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background To discriminatively evaluate the cost-saving effects of a disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients through care process rectification and, subsequently, improved health outcomes. Methods This study links public medical insurance claims data to the health records of a disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients. To account for selection bias caused by the non-randomized allocation of the disease management program for diabetes patients, we adopted a fixed-effect model of panel data analysis. To discriminatively evaluate the cost-saving effects of the disease management program for diabetic nephropathy patients through care process rectification and, subsequently, improved health outcomes, we expanded the difference-in-differences analysis from the traditional two-period model to a three-period model, comprising the before-intervention, during-intervention, and after-intervention periods. Data were extracted from municipal public insurers in Kure, Japan. Results The cost-reduction effect in terms of treatment costs from the before-intervention period to the during-intervention period (the rectification effect) was 4.02%, and the cost-saving effect from the during-intervention period to the after-intervention period (the health improvement effect) was 2.95%. Conclusions A disease management program for diabetes patients organized by local public insurers in Japan reduced costs both by amending treatment processes and by subsequently improving the prognosis of the disease. |
topic |
Disease management Diabetes Dialysis Difference-in-differences analysis Charlson comorbidity index |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05297-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hiroyukikawaguchi doesdiseasemanagementfordiabeticnephropathyreducemedicalexpenditureevidencefromathreeperioddifferenceindifferencesanalysis AT michikomoriyama doesdiseasemanagementfordiabeticnephropathyreducemedicalexpenditureevidencefromathreeperioddifferenceindifferencesanalysis AT hidekihashimoto doesdiseasemanagementfordiabeticnephropathyreducemedicalexpenditureevidencefromathreeperioddifferenceindifferencesanalysis |
_version_ |
1724638847867813888 |