Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The reliability of range of motion (ROM) measurements has not been established for the hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in patients with hallux rigidus. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the clinical versus radiographic di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ettore Vulcano MD, Joseph A. Tracey BSc (Med), MSc, Mark S. Myerson MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-08-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00120
id doaj-98752761438a4750a6222c39fc79bf1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98752761438a4750a6222c39fc79bf1d2020-11-25T03:32:42ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142016-08-01110.1177/2473011416S00120Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux RigidusEttore Vulcano MDJoseph A. Tracey BSc (Med), MScMark S. Myerson MDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The reliability of range of motion (ROM) measurements has not been established for the hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in patients with hallux rigidus. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the clinical versus radiographic difference in ROM of the arthritic hallux MTP joint. Methods: One-hundred consecutive patients who presented with any grade of hallux rigidus were included in this prospective study to determine the hallux MTP dorsiflexion. Clinical range of motion using a goniometer and radiographic range of motion on dynamic xrays was recorded. Inter and intra-rater reliability were calculated. Results: The mean difference between clinical and radiographic dorsiflexion was 13°. This difference was statistically significant. For all measurements clinical dorsiflexion was equal or less than radiographically-measured dorsiflexion. The difference was significantly greater in patients with a clinical dorsiflexion of less than 30° than in patients with 30° or more. Radiographic measurement of hallux dorsiflexion had an excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Conclusion: This study describes a reliable, reproducible, and straightforward method of measuring hallux MTP ROM that eliminates the “human” component of measuring clinical ROM and all the variables that are encountered when making said measurement.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00120
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ettore Vulcano MD
Joseph A. Tracey BSc (Med), MSc
Mark S. Myerson MD
spellingShingle Ettore Vulcano MD
Joseph A. Tracey BSc (Med), MSc
Mark S. Myerson MD
Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet Ettore Vulcano MD
Joseph A. Tracey BSc (Med), MSc
Mark S. Myerson MD
author_sort Ettore Vulcano MD
title Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
title_short Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
title_full Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
title_fullStr Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
title_full_unstemmed Accurate Measurement of First Metatarsophalangeal Range of Motion in Patients with Hallux Rigidus
title_sort accurate measurement of first metatarsophalangeal range of motion in patients with hallux rigidus
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The reliability of range of motion (ROM) measurements has not been established for the hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in patients with hallux rigidus. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the clinical versus radiographic difference in ROM of the arthritic hallux MTP joint. Methods: One-hundred consecutive patients who presented with any grade of hallux rigidus were included in this prospective study to determine the hallux MTP dorsiflexion. Clinical range of motion using a goniometer and radiographic range of motion on dynamic xrays was recorded. Inter and intra-rater reliability were calculated. Results: The mean difference between clinical and radiographic dorsiflexion was 13°. This difference was statistically significant. For all measurements clinical dorsiflexion was equal or less than radiographically-measured dorsiflexion. The difference was significantly greater in patients with a clinical dorsiflexion of less than 30° than in patients with 30° or more. Radiographic measurement of hallux dorsiflexion had an excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. Conclusion: This study describes a reliable, reproducible, and straightforward method of measuring hallux MTP ROM that eliminates the “human” component of measuring clinical ROM and all the variables that are encountered when making said measurement.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00120
work_keys_str_mv AT ettorevulcanomd accuratemeasurementoffirstmetatarsophalangealrangeofmotioninpatientswithhalluxrigidus
AT josephatraceybscmedmsc accuratemeasurementoffirstmetatarsophalangealrangeofmotioninpatientswithhalluxrigidus
AT marksmyersonmd accuratemeasurementoffirstmetatarsophalangealrangeofmotioninpatientswithhalluxrigidus
_version_ 1724566541876330496