Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility

C57BL/6 (B6) and C3H/HeJ (C3H) are two commonly used mouse strains that differ markedly in atherosclerosis susceptibility. In this study, we determined plaque formation after removal of the endothelium in the two strains carrying the mutant apolipoprotein E gene (apoE−/−). At 10 weeks of age, male B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weibin Shi, Hong Pei, Joshua J. Fischer, Jessica C. James, John F. Angle, Alan H. Matsumoto, Gregory A. Helm, Ian J. Sarembock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2004-11-01
Series:Journal of Lipid Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520341298
id doaj-98988394c6d2499399cf07aa949ceec9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Weibin Shi
Hong Pei
Joshua J. Fischer
Jessica C. James
John F. Angle
Alan H. Matsumoto
Gregory A. Helm
Ian J. Sarembock
spellingShingle Weibin Shi
Hong Pei
Joshua J. Fischer
Jessica C. James
John F. Angle
Alan H. Matsumoto
Gregory A. Helm
Ian J. Sarembock
Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
Journal of Lipid Research
neointima
hyperlipidemia
endothelium
endothelial denudation
author_facet Weibin Shi
Hong Pei
Joshua J. Fischer
Jessica C. James
John F. Angle
Alan H. Matsumoto
Gregory A. Helm
Ian J. Sarembock
author_sort Weibin Shi
title Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
title_short Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
title_full Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
title_fullStr Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
title_full_unstemmed Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
title_sort neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein e-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibility
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Lipid Research
issn 0022-2275
publishDate 2004-11-01
description C57BL/6 (B6) and C3H/HeJ (C3H) are two commonly used mouse strains that differ markedly in atherosclerosis susceptibility. In this study, we determined plaque formation after removal of the endothelium in the two strains carrying the mutant apolipoprotein E gene (apoE−/−). At 10 weeks of age, male B6.apoE−/− and C3H.apoE−/− mice underwent endothelial denudation of the left common carotid artery. Two weeks after injury, B6.apoE−/− mice developed significantly larger neointimal lesions in the vessel than their C3H.apoE−/− counterparts, although they had comparable plasma cholesterol levels on a chow diet. Feeding of a Western diet aggravated lesion formation in both strains, but the increase was more dramatic in B6.apoE−/− mice than in C3H.apoE−/− mice. Immunohistochemical and histological analyses demonstrated the presence of macrophage foam cells in neointimal lesions. We then compared neointimal growth in F1 mice reconstituted with bone marrow from B6.apoE−/− and C3H.apoE−/− mice. No significant lesions were observed 2 weeks after endothelial denudation in the mice reconstituted with bone marrow from either donor.Thus, these data indicate that foam cell formation contributes to neointimal growth in the hyperlipidemic apoE−/− model and that neither endothelial cells nor blood cells alone explain the dramatic difference between B6 and C3H mice in plaque formation.
topic neointima
hyperlipidemia
endothelium
endothelial denudation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520341298
work_keys_str_mv AT weibinshi neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT hongpei neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT joshuajfischer neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT jessicacjames neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT johnfangle neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT alanhmatsumoto neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT gregoryahelm neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
AT ianjsarembock neointimalformationintwoapolipoproteinedeficientmousestrainswithdifferentatherosclerosissusceptibility
_version_ 1721506368238649344
spelling doaj-98988394c6d2499399cf07aa949ceec92021-04-27T04:46:50ZengElsevierJournal of Lipid Research0022-22752004-11-01451120082014Neointimal formation in two apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse strains with different atherosclerosis susceptibilityWeibin Shi0Hong Pei1Joshua J. Fischer2Jessica C. James3John F. Angle4Alan H. Matsumoto5Gregory A. Helm6Ian J. Sarembock7Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908C57BL/6 (B6) and C3H/HeJ (C3H) are two commonly used mouse strains that differ markedly in atherosclerosis susceptibility. In this study, we determined plaque formation after removal of the endothelium in the two strains carrying the mutant apolipoprotein E gene (apoE−/−). At 10 weeks of age, male B6.apoE−/− and C3H.apoE−/− mice underwent endothelial denudation of the left common carotid artery. Two weeks after injury, B6.apoE−/− mice developed significantly larger neointimal lesions in the vessel than their C3H.apoE−/− counterparts, although they had comparable plasma cholesterol levels on a chow diet. Feeding of a Western diet aggravated lesion formation in both strains, but the increase was more dramatic in B6.apoE−/− mice than in C3H.apoE−/− mice. Immunohistochemical and histological analyses demonstrated the presence of macrophage foam cells in neointimal lesions. We then compared neointimal growth in F1 mice reconstituted with bone marrow from B6.apoE−/− and C3H.apoE−/− mice. No significant lesions were observed 2 weeks after endothelial denudation in the mice reconstituted with bone marrow from either donor.Thus, these data indicate that foam cell formation contributes to neointimal growth in the hyperlipidemic apoE−/− model and that neither endothelial cells nor blood cells alone explain the dramatic difference between B6 and C3H mice in plaque formation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520341298neointimahyperlipidemiaendotheliumendothelial denudation