Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the associations between objectively measured sitting and standing duration and intensity of low-back pain (LBP) among Norwegian construction and healthcare workers. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four workers wore two accelerometers for 3-4 consecutive day...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lars-Kristian Lunde, Markus Koch, Stein Knardahl, Kaj Bo Veiersted
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH) 2017-05-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Subjects:
Online Access: https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3628
id doaj-98b4ae67eb054ae48e385c97fc263ccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98b4ae67eb054ae48e385c97fc263ccf2021-04-21T06:57:53ZengNordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health0355-31401795-990X2017-05-0143326927810.5271/sjweh.36283628Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workersLars-Kristian Lunde0Markus KochStein KnardahlKaj Bo VeierstedNational Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas vei 8, 0336 Oslo, Norway.OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the associations between objectively measured sitting and standing duration and intensity of low-back pain (LBP) among Norwegian construction and healthcare workers. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four workers wore two accelerometers for 3-4 consecutive days, during work and leisure. Minutes of sitting and standing was calculated from accelerometer data. We obtained self-reported LBP intensity (0–3) at the time of objective measurement and after six months. We examined associations with linear mixed models and presented results per 100 minutes. RESULTS: For healthcare workers, the duration of sitting during work [β= -0.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.55– -0.10] and during full-day (work + leisure) (β= -0.21, 95% CI -0.38– -0.04) was associated with baseline LBP intensity. Furthermore, minutes of sitting at work (β=-0.35, 95% CI -0.57– -0.13) and during the full day (β=-0.20, 95% CI -0.37– -0.04) were significantly associated with LBP intensity at six months. Associations were attenuated when adjusting for work-related mechanical and psychosocial covariates and objectively measured exposure during leisure time. No significant associations between sitting and LBP intensity were found for construction workers. Standing at work was not consistently associated with LBP intensity at baseline or after six months for any work sector. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a long duration of sitting at work is associated with lower levels of LBP intensity among healthcare workers. Standing duration had no consistent associations with LBP intensity. https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3628 healthcare workerhealthcarehealthcare workstandingaccelerometerlow-back painphysical work exposuremusculoskeletal disordersittingback painconstructionprospective designpainphysical workconstruction workconstruction workerobjective measure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lars-Kristian Lunde
Markus Koch
Stein Knardahl
Kaj Bo Veiersted
spellingShingle Lars-Kristian Lunde
Markus Koch
Stein Knardahl
Kaj Bo Veiersted
Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
healthcare worker
healthcare
healthcare work
standing
accelerometer
low-back pain
physical work exposure
musculoskeletal disorder
sitting
back pain
construction
prospective design
pain
physical work
construction work
construction worker
objective measure
author_facet Lars-Kristian Lunde
Markus Koch
Stein Knardahl
Kaj Bo Veiersted
author_sort Lars-Kristian Lunde
title Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
title_short Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
title_full Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
title_fullStr Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
title_sort associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers
publisher Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH)
series Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
publishDate 2017-05-01
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the associations between objectively measured sitting and standing duration and intensity of low-back pain (LBP) among Norwegian construction and healthcare workers. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four workers wore two accelerometers for 3-4 consecutive days, during work and leisure. Minutes of sitting and standing was calculated from accelerometer data. We obtained self-reported LBP intensity (0–3) at the time of objective measurement and after six months. We examined associations with linear mixed models and presented results per 100 minutes. RESULTS: For healthcare workers, the duration of sitting during work [β= -0.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.55– -0.10] and during full-day (work + leisure) (β= -0.21, 95% CI -0.38– -0.04) was associated with baseline LBP intensity. Furthermore, minutes of sitting at work (β=-0.35, 95% CI -0.57– -0.13) and during the full day (β=-0.20, 95% CI -0.37– -0.04) were significantly associated with LBP intensity at six months. Associations were attenuated when adjusting for work-related mechanical and psychosocial covariates and objectively measured exposure during leisure time. No significant associations between sitting and LBP intensity were found for construction workers. Standing at work was not consistently associated with LBP intensity at baseline or after six months for any work sector. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a long duration of sitting at work is associated with lower levels of LBP intensity among healthcare workers. Standing duration had no consistent associations with LBP intensity.
topic healthcare worker
healthcare
healthcare work
standing
accelerometer
low-back pain
physical work exposure
musculoskeletal disorder
sitting
back pain
construction
prospective design
pain
physical work
construction work
construction worker
objective measure
url https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3628
work_keys_str_mv AT larskristianlunde associationsofobjectivelymeasuredsittingandstandingwithlowbackpainintensitya6monthfollowupofconstructionandhealthcareworkers
AT markuskoch associationsofobjectivelymeasuredsittingandstandingwithlowbackpainintensitya6monthfollowupofconstructionandhealthcareworkers
AT steinknardahl associationsofobjectivelymeasuredsittingandstandingwithlowbackpainintensitya6monthfollowupofconstructionandhealthcareworkers
AT kajboveiersted associationsofobjectivelymeasuredsittingandstandingwithlowbackpainintensitya6monthfollowupofconstructionandhealthcareworkers
_version_ 1721516692594491392