Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.

Cooperation is one of the essential factors for all biological organisms in major evolutionary transitions. Recent studies have investigated the effect of migration for the evolution of cooperation. However, little is known about whether and how an individuals' cooperativeness coevolves with mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Genki Ichinose, Masaya Saito, Shinsuke Suzuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23861786/?tool=EBI
id doaj-98c111a8c109446e85e7edf61387177b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98c111a8c109446e85e7edf61387177b2021-03-03T20:21:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0187e6770210.1371/journal.pone.0067702Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.Genki IchinoseMasaya SaitoShinsuke SuzukiCooperation is one of the essential factors for all biological organisms in major evolutionary transitions. Recent studies have investigated the effect of migration for the evolution of cooperation. However, little is known about whether and how an individuals' cooperativeness coevolves with mobility. One possibility is that mobility enhances cooperation by enabling cooperators to escape from defectors and form clusters; the other possibility is that mobility inhibits cooperation by helping the defectors to catch and exploit the groups of cooperators. In this study we investigate the coevolutionary dynamics by using the prisoner's dilemma game model on a lattice structure. The computer simulations demonstrate that natural selection maintains cooperation in the form of evolutionary chasing between the cooperators and defectors. First, cooperative groups grow and collectively move in the same direction. Then, mutant defectors emerge and invade the cooperative groups, after which the defectors exploit the cooperators. Then other cooperative groups emerge due to mutation and the cycle is repeated. Here, it is worth noting that, as a result of natural selection, the mobility evolves towards directional migration, but not to random or completely fixed migration. Furthermore, with directional migration, the rate of global population extinction is lower when compared with other cases without the evolution of mobility (i.e., when mobility is preset to random or fixed). These findings illustrate the coevolutionary dynamics of cooperation and mobility through the directional chasing between cooperators and defectors.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23861786/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Genki Ichinose
Masaya Saito
Shinsuke Suzuki
spellingShingle Genki Ichinose
Masaya Saito
Shinsuke Suzuki
Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Genki Ichinose
Masaya Saito
Shinsuke Suzuki
author_sort Genki Ichinose
title Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
title_short Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
title_full Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
title_fullStr Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
title_full_unstemmed Collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
title_sort collective chasing behavior between cooperators and defectors in the spatial prisoner's dilemma.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Cooperation is one of the essential factors for all biological organisms in major evolutionary transitions. Recent studies have investigated the effect of migration for the evolution of cooperation. However, little is known about whether and how an individuals' cooperativeness coevolves with mobility. One possibility is that mobility enhances cooperation by enabling cooperators to escape from defectors and form clusters; the other possibility is that mobility inhibits cooperation by helping the defectors to catch and exploit the groups of cooperators. In this study we investigate the coevolutionary dynamics by using the prisoner's dilemma game model on a lattice structure. The computer simulations demonstrate that natural selection maintains cooperation in the form of evolutionary chasing between the cooperators and defectors. First, cooperative groups grow and collectively move in the same direction. Then, mutant defectors emerge and invade the cooperative groups, after which the defectors exploit the cooperators. Then other cooperative groups emerge due to mutation and the cycle is repeated. Here, it is worth noting that, as a result of natural selection, the mobility evolves towards directional migration, but not to random or completely fixed migration. Furthermore, with directional migration, the rate of global population extinction is lower when compared with other cases without the evolution of mobility (i.e., when mobility is preset to random or fixed). These findings illustrate the coevolutionary dynamics of cooperation and mobility through the directional chasing between cooperators and defectors.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23861786/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT genkiichinose collectivechasingbehaviorbetweencooperatorsanddefectorsinthespatialprisonersdilemma
AT masayasaito collectivechasingbehaviorbetweencooperatorsanddefectorsinthespatialprisonersdilemma
AT shinsukesuzuki collectivechasingbehaviorbetweencooperatorsanddefectorsinthespatialprisonersdilemma
_version_ 1714822759188529152