Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education

In this article we address the issue of how an instrumental approach to sustainability education has dominated the scientific debate of the last 20 years. By conducting interviews and focus group interviews, we have investigated a community arts initiative in the Flemish city of Antwerp in which art...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viktor Swillens, Mathias Decuypere, Joke Vandenabeele, Joris Vlieghe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4204
id doaj-98c4a7daa8384816a7556be2419dce0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98c4a7daa8384816a7556be2419dce0a2021-04-09T23:04:40ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-04-01134204420410.3390/su13084204Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability EducationViktor Swillens0Mathias Decuypere1Joke Vandenabeele2Joris Vlieghe3Education, Culture & Society, KU Leuven, Vesaliusstraat 2, P.O. Box 03761, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumMethodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, P.O. Box 03762, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumEducation, Culture & Society, KU Leuven, Vesaliusstraat 2, P.O. Box 03761, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumEducation, Culture & Society, KU Leuven, Vesaliusstraat 2, P.O. Box 03761, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumIn this article we address the issue of how an instrumental approach to sustainability education has dominated the scientific debate of the last 20 years. By conducting interviews and focus group interviews, we have investigated a community arts initiative in the Flemish city of Antwerp in which artists together with local inhabitants engaged in activities around two art installations and address the sustainability of a particular living environment. Our empirical study of this place-based initiative that we call a ‘critical zone observatory’ has been enriched by the work of Bruno Latour, Richard Sennett and Hans Schildermans. We conclude that a temporal and spatial shift in sustainability education (research) is needed from (1) development (a steady movement towards a planned future) and (2) human stewardship (the capability of people to shape their passive living environments) to (1) what we call co-sperity (a collective hope in the present) and (2) inhabitation (an attached and undetermined engagement with the dynamic of one’s habitat). By proposing a collective study pedagogy as an alternative to individual training, we suggest a need for future research on critical zone observatories.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4204sustainability educationcommunity artsstudy practicesplace-based educationcritical zone observatory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Viktor Swillens
Mathias Decuypere
Joke Vandenabeele
Joris Vlieghe
spellingShingle Viktor Swillens
Mathias Decuypere
Joke Vandenabeele
Joris Vlieghe
Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
Sustainability
sustainability education
community arts
study practices
place-based education
critical zone observatory
author_facet Viktor Swillens
Mathias Decuypere
Joke Vandenabeele
Joris Vlieghe
author_sort Viktor Swillens
title Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
title_short Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
title_full Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
title_fullStr Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
title_full_unstemmed Place-Sensing through Haptic Interfaces: Proposing an Alternative to Modern Sustainability Education
title_sort place-sensing through haptic interfaces: proposing an alternative to modern sustainability education
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-04-01
description In this article we address the issue of how an instrumental approach to sustainability education has dominated the scientific debate of the last 20 years. By conducting interviews and focus group interviews, we have investigated a community arts initiative in the Flemish city of Antwerp in which artists together with local inhabitants engaged in activities around two art installations and address the sustainability of a particular living environment. Our empirical study of this place-based initiative that we call a ‘critical zone observatory’ has been enriched by the work of Bruno Latour, Richard Sennett and Hans Schildermans. We conclude that a temporal and spatial shift in sustainability education (research) is needed from (1) development (a steady movement towards a planned future) and (2) human stewardship (the capability of people to shape their passive living environments) to (1) what we call co-sperity (a collective hope in the present) and (2) inhabitation (an attached and undetermined engagement with the dynamic of one’s habitat). By proposing a collective study pedagogy as an alternative to individual training, we suggest a need for future research on critical zone observatories.
topic sustainability education
community arts
study practices
place-based education
critical zone observatory
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4204
work_keys_str_mv AT viktorswillens placesensingthroughhapticinterfacesproposinganalternativetomodernsustainabilityeducation
AT mathiasdecuypere placesensingthroughhapticinterfacesproposinganalternativetomodernsustainabilityeducation
AT jokevandenabeele placesensingthroughhapticinterfacesproposinganalternativetomodernsustainabilityeducation
AT jorisvlieghe placesensingthroughhapticinterfacesproposinganalternativetomodernsustainabilityeducation
_version_ 1721532204991905792