Progress in Research Data Services

University libraries have played an important role in constructing an infrastructure of support for Research Data Management at an institutional level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two international surveys of libraries about their involvement in Research Data Services conducted in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew M Cox, Dr, Mary Anne Kennan, Dr, Elizabeth Josephine Lyon, Dr, Stephen Pinfield, Dr, Laura Sbaffi, Dr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2019-09-01
Series:International Journal of Digital Curation
Online Access:http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/595
id doaj-98edd0527fa94767b1d7935d47254fa8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98edd0527fa94767b1d7935d47254fa82020-11-25T03:02:06ZengUniversity of EdinburghInternational Journal of Digital Curation1746-82562019-09-0114110.2218/ijdc.v14i1.595Progress in Research Data ServicesAndrew M Cox, Dr0Mary Anne Kennan, Dr1Elizabeth Josephine Lyon, Dr2Stephen Pinfield, Dr3Laura Sbaffi, Dr4Information School, University of SheffieldCharles Sturt UniversityiSchool, University of PittsburghInformation School, University of SheffieldUniversity of SheffieldUniversity libraries have played an important role in constructing an infrastructure of support for Research Data Management at an institutional level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two international surveys of libraries about their involvement in Research Data Services conducted in 2014 and 2018. The aim was to explore how services had developed over this time period, and to explore the drivers and barriers to change. In particular, there was an interest in how far the FAIR data principles had been adopted. Services in nearly every area were more developed in 2018 than before, but technical services remained less developed than advisory. Progress on institutional policy was also evident. However, priorities did not seem to have shifted significantly. Open ended answers suggested that funder policy, rather than researcher demand, remained the main driver of service development and that resources and skills gaps remained issues. While widely understood as an important reference point and standard, because of their relatively recent publication date, FAIR principles had not been widely adopted explicitly in policy. http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/595
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew M Cox, Dr
Mary Anne Kennan, Dr
Elizabeth Josephine Lyon, Dr
Stephen Pinfield, Dr
Laura Sbaffi, Dr
spellingShingle Andrew M Cox, Dr
Mary Anne Kennan, Dr
Elizabeth Josephine Lyon, Dr
Stephen Pinfield, Dr
Laura Sbaffi, Dr
Progress in Research Data Services
International Journal of Digital Curation
author_facet Andrew M Cox, Dr
Mary Anne Kennan, Dr
Elizabeth Josephine Lyon, Dr
Stephen Pinfield, Dr
Laura Sbaffi, Dr
author_sort Andrew M Cox, Dr
title Progress in Research Data Services
title_short Progress in Research Data Services
title_full Progress in Research Data Services
title_fullStr Progress in Research Data Services
title_full_unstemmed Progress in Research Data Services
title_sort progress in research data services
publisher University of Edinburgh
series International Journal of Digital Curation
issn 1746-8256
publishDate 2019-09-01
description University libraries have played an important role in constructing an infrastructure of support for Research Data Management at an institutional level. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two international surveys of libraries about their involvement in Research Data Services conducted in 2014 and 2018. The aim was to explore how services had developed over this time period, and to explore the drivers and barriers to change. In particular, there was an interest in how far the FAIR data principles had been adopted. Services in nearly every area were more developed in 2018 than before, but technical services remained less developed than advisory. Progress on institutional policy was also evident. However, priorities did not seem to have shifted significantly. Open ended answers suggested that funder policy, rather than researcher demand, remained the main driver of service development and that resources and skills gaps remained issues. While widely understood as an important reference point and standard, because of their relatively recent publication date, FAIR principles had not been widely adopted explicitly in policy.
url http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/595
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmcoxdr progressinresearchdataservices
AT maryannekennandr progressinresearchdataservices
AT elizabethjosephinelyondr progressinresearchdataservices
AT stephenpinfielddr progressinresearchdataservices
AT laurasbaffidr progressinresearchdataservices
_version_ 1724691379211206656