Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation

Background: Patient advocacy has fostered the implementation of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification legislation in many states. Little is known about the perspectives of women, primary care physicians (PCPs), and breast radiologists in response to this legislation. The objective of this r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elissa V. Klinger SM, Celia P. Kaplan DrPH, MA, Stella St. Hubert BA, Robyn L. Birdwell MD, Jennifer S. Haas MD, MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-11-01
Series:MDM Policy & Practice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316680620
id doaj-9906ae5889b9482d912bd6a7450b561a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9906ae5889b9482d912bd6a7450b561a2020-11-25T03:28:47ZengSAGE PublishingMDM Policy & Practice2381-46832016-11-01110.1177/2381468316680620Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification LegislationElissa V. Klinger SMCelia P. Kaplan DrPH, MAStella St. Hubert BARobyn L. Birdwell MDJennifer S. Haas MD, MScBackground: Patient advocacy has fostered the implementation of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification legislation in many states. Little is known about the perspectives of women, primary care physicians (PCPs), and breast radiologists in response to this legislation. The objective of this research was to elicit qualitative information from these multiple stakeholders to understand varied perspectives on the subject of MBD notification and inform best practices around implementation. Methods: Content analysis of narrative data from focus groups with women (2 groups, total of 16 participants) and in-depth interviews with PCPs (n = 7) and breast radiologists (n = 7). Results: Three major themes emerged from the data: 1) knowledge and general attitudes about legislation, 2) concerns about consequences, and 3) actions patients and clinicians should consider based on MBD information. For each of these themes, the views of women, PCPs, and radiologists often demonstrated different perspectives. Conclusion: This work supports the need for clear and concise tools for patients and providers to understand MBD in the context of a woman’s overall breast cancer risk with guidance on next steps.https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316680620
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elissa V. Klinger SM
Celia P. Kaplan DrPH, MA
Stella St. Hubert BA
Robyn L. Birdwell MD
Jennifer S. Haas MD, MSc
spellingShingle Elissa V. Klinger SM
Celia P. Kaplan DrPH, MA
Stella St. Hubert BA
Robyn L. Birdwell MD
Jennifer S. Haas MD, MSc
Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
MDM Policy & Practice
author_facet Elissa V. Klinger SM
Celia P. Kaplan DrPH, MA
Stella St. Hubert BA
Robyn L. Birdwell MD
Jennifer S. Haas MD, MSc
author_sort Elissa V. Klinger SM
title Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
title_short Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
title_full Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
title_fullStr Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
title_sort patient and provider perspectives on mammographic breast density notification legislation
publisher SAGE Publishing
series MDM Policy & Practice
issn 2381-4683
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Background: Patient advocacy has fostered the implementation of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification legislation in many states. Little is known about the perspectives of women, primary care physicians (PCPs), and breast radiologists in response to this legislation. The objective of this research was to elicit qualitative information from these multiple stakeholders to understand varied perspectives on the subject of MBD notification and inform best practices around implementation. Methods: Content analysis of narrative data from focus groups with women (2 groups, total of 16 participants) and in-depth interviews with PCPs (n = 7) and breast radiologists (n = 7). Results: Three major themes emerged from the data: 1) knowledge and general attitudes about legislation, 2) concerns about consequences, and 3) actions patients and clinicians should consider based on MBD information. For each of these themes, the views of women, PCPs, and radiologists often demonstrated different perspectives. Conclusion: This work supports the need for clear and concise tools for patients and providers to understand MBD in the context of a woman’s overall breast cancer risk with guidance on next steps.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316680620
work_keys_str_mv AT elissavklingersm patientandproviderperspectivesonmammographicbreastdensitynotificationlegislation
AT celiapkaplandrphma patientandproviderperspectivesonmammographicbreastdensitynotificationlegislation
AT stellasthubertba patientandproviderperspectivesonmammographicbreastdensitynotificationlegislation
AT robynlbirdwellmd patientandproviderperspectivesonmammographicbreastdensitynotificationlegislation
AT jennifershaasmdmsc patientandproviderperspectivesonmammographicbreastdensitynotificationlegislation
_version_ 1724582787941400576