Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial, besides its inappropriate use puts patients at risk of adverse reactions and the development of bacterial resistance. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez, Víctor Chumpitaz Cerrate, Lesly Chavez Rimache
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Editorial de Ciencias Médicas (ECIMED) 2020-07-01
Series:Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/676
id doaj-990ff53d8c9a4a609edd52f8631b98de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-990ff53d8c9a4a609edd52f8631b98de2020-11-25T03:07:36ZspaCentro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Editorial de Ciencias Médicas (ECIMED)Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas0864-03001561-30112020-07-01393503Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysisYuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez0Víctor Chumpitaz Cerrate1Lesly Chavez Rimache2Universidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San MarcosIntroduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial, besides its inappropriate use puts patients at risk of adverse reactions and the development of bacterial resistance. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the reduction of postoperative infections after the extraction of impacted third molars. Materials and Methods. The ScienceDirect, Clinical trials.gov and Scopus databases were used to locate clinical trials. The primary variables included: presence of postoperative infections (wound and / or alveolitis), adverse reactions, trismus and pain. Meta-analysis with homogeneous studies was carried out through random effects analysis. The risk of bias of the included trials was assessed through the Cochrane guide. The overall relative risk was calculated using the inverse variance approach with the random effects method. Results: 14 clinical trials were analyzed qualitatively, while 9 were analyzed quantitatively. Of a total of 874 patients, 49 (5.6%) presented postoperative infections (16/446 for the experimental group and 33/428 for the placebo group). The meta-analysis showed an overall relative risk of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.27-0.94). This value is for studies that used only amoxicillin as a prophylactic measure, an OR of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.27-1.03). The main adverse reactions reported included: diarrhea, gastrointestinal reactions, fever and gastric pain. Conclusions: Systemic antibiotics administered before surgery were effective in reducing the frequency of postoperative infections after extraction of impacted third molars.http://www.revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/676metaanálisisprofilaxis antibióticatercer molaralveolo secocirugía bucal
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez
Víctor Chumpitaz Cerrate
Lesly Chavez Rimache
spellingShingle Yuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez
Víctor Chumpitaz Cerrate
Lesly Chavez Rimache
Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas
metaanálisis
profilaxis antibiótica
tercer molar
alveolo seco
cirugía bucal
author_facet Yuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez
Víctor Chumpitaz Cerrate
Lesly Chavez Rimache
author_sort Yuri Alejandro Castro-Rodríguez
title Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of postoperative infections in impacted third molar surgery. systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Editorial de Ciencias Médicas (ECIMED)
series Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas
issn 0864-0300
1561-3011
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Introduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is controversial, besides its inappropriate use puts patients at risk of adverse reactions and the development of bacterial resistance. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the reduction of postoperative infections after the extraction of impacted third molars. Materials and Methods. The ScienceDirect, Clinical trials.gov and Scopus databases were used to locate clinical trials. The primary variables included: presence of postoperative infections (wound and / or alveolitis), adverse reactions, trismus and pain. Meta-analysis with homogeneous studies was carried out through random effects analysis. The risk of bias of the included trials was assessed through the Cochrane guide. The overall relative risk was calculated using the inverse variance approach with the random effects method. Results: 14 clinical trials were analyzed qualitatively, while 9 were analyzed quantitatively. Of a total of 874 patients, 49 (5.6%) presented postoperative infections (16/446 for the experimental group and 33/428 for the placebo group). The meta-analysis showed an overall relative risk of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.27-0.94). This value is for studies that used only amoxicillin as a prophylactic measure, an OR of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.27-1.03). The main adverse reactions reported included: diarrhea, gastrointestinal reactions, fever and gastric pain. Conclusions: Systemic antibiotics administered before surgery were effective in reducing the frequency of postoperative infections after extraction of impacted third molars.
topic metaanálisis
profilaxis antibiótica
tercer molar
alveolo seco
cirugía bucal
url http://www.revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/676
work_keys_str_mv AT yurialejandrocastrorodriguez efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinthepreventionofpostoperativeinfectionsinimpactedthirdmolarsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT victorchumpitazcerrate efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinthepreventionofpostoperativeinfectionsinimpactedthirdmolarsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leslychavezrimache efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinthepreventionofpostoperativeinfectionsinimpactedthirdmolarsurgerysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724669541658656768