Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland

Parents’ and teachers’ well-functioning communication supports their partnership and also benefits pupils’ well-being. Today, communication largely takes place using electronic tools. In the current study, Finnish parents’ (N = 1123) and teachers’ (N = 118) opinions on digital communication in urban...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne-Mari Kuusimäki, Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara, Kirsi Tirri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8236786
id doaj-9950f69334df4f959cc95176ff973776
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9950f69334df4f959cc95176ff9737762020-11-25T01:32:31ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102019-01-01201910.1155/2019/82367868236786Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in FinlandAnne-Mari Kuusimäki0Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara1Kirsi Tirri2Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies and Department of Education, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandParents’ and teachers’ well-functioning communication supports their partnership and also benefits pupils’ well-being. Today, communication largely takes place using electronic tools. In the current study, Finnish parents’ (N = 1123) and teachers’ (N = 118) opinions on digital communication in urban and rural areas were studied by applying a new 14-item Digital Communication Scale (DCS) created for the purpose. The three-factor structured DCS was used to elucidate parents’ and teachers’ views on their partnership, feedback, and clarity of messaging. In contrast to some negative headlines and myths, the main finding of our study was overall satisfaction with digital communication, which was seen as supporting the parent-teacher partnership and providing valuable information on pupils’ development and their everyday issues. In particular, rural parents seemed satisfied with digital communication as a partnership-building tool. However, the view of parents was that they received less encouraging feedback about their children than teachers believed they had given. On the other hand, teachers experienced more ambiguity in digital communication than parents. This was more salient among urban teachers than among rural teachers. To summarize, rural parents and rural teachers saw digital communication as serving their collaboration better than did their urban peers. The results of the current study can be used for further development of parent-teacher communication in digital environments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8236786
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne-Mari Kuusimäki
Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara
Kirsi Tirri
spellingShingle Anne-Mari Kuusimäki
Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara
Kirsi Tirri
Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
Education Research International
author_facet Anne-Mari Kuusimäki
Lotta Uusitalo-Malmivaara
Kirsi Tirri
author_sort Anne-Mari Kuusimäki
title Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
title_short Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
title_full Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
title_fullStr Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Parents’ and Teachers’ Views on Digital Communication in Finland
title_sort parents’ and teachers’ views on digital communication in finland
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Parents’ and teachers’ well-functioning communication supports their partnership and also benefits pupils’ well-being. Today, communication largely takes place using electronic tools. In the current study, Finnish parents’ (N = 1123) and teachers’ (N = 118) opinions on digital communication in urban and rural areas were studied by applying a new 14-item Digital Communication Scale (DCS) created for the purpose. The three-factor structured DCS was used to elucidate parents’ and teachers’ views on their partnership, feedback, and clarity of messaging. In contrast to some negative headlines and myths, the main finding of our study was overall satisfaction with digital communication, which was seen as supporting the parent-teacher partnership and providing valuable information on pupils’ development and their everyday issues. In particular, rural parents seemed satisfied with digital communication as a partnership-building tool. However, the view of parents was that they received less encouraging feedback about their children than teachers believed they had given. On the other hand, teachers experienced more ambiguity in digital communication than parents. This was more salient among urban teachers than among rural teachers. To summarize, rural parents and rural teachers saw digital communication as serving their collaboration better than did their urban peers. The results of the current study can be used for further development of parent-teacher communication in digital environments.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8236786
work_keys_str_mv AT annemarikuusimaki parentsandteachersviewsondigitalcommunicationinfinland
AT lottauusitalomalmivaara parentsandteachersviewsondigitalcommunicationinfinland
AT kirsitirri parentsandteachersviewsondigitalcommunicationinfinland
_version_ 1725081521157570560