Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the extent of resection (EOR) on survival outcome using propensity score-based approaches. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) and propens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thara Tunthanathip, Suphavadee Madteng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-03-01
Series:Brazilian Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1718424
id doaj-996e95a0626942be822c294fc857a585
record_format Article
spelling doaj-996e95a0626942be822c294fc857a5852021-06-28T22:41:17ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Brazilian Neurosurgery0103-53552359-59222021-03-01400103704310.1055/s-0040-1718424Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score ApproachThara Tunthanathip0Suphavadee Madteng1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, ThailandDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, ThailandObjective To evaluate the effectiveness of the extent of resection (EOR) on survival outcome using propensity score-based approaches. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) and propensity score regression adjustment were used in the matched and unmatched dataset, respectively. Therefore, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox's regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of the EOR on survival outcomes. Results One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included for analyzes. The total tumor resection in the unmatched dataset was 22.6% of all cases. Using PSM, incomplete tumor resection had an unfavorable survival outcome when compared with total tumor resection (hazard ratio (HR) 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72–4.94). Additionally, biopsy and partial tumor resection were significantly associated with poor prognosis when compared with total tumor resection using propensity score regression adjustment (HR of biopsy 1.89, 95%CI 1.13–3.16 and HR of partial resection 1.89, 95%CI 1.28–2.80). Conclusions Patients with total tumor resection tend to have a more favorable prognosis than patients with partial tumor resection. The propensity score-based analysis is an alternative approach to evaluate the effect of an intervention that has limitations to perform a randomized controlled trial.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1718424glioblastomaextension of resectionsurvival analysispropensity score
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thara Tunthanathip
Suphavadee Madteng
spellingShingle Thara Tunthanathip
Suphavadee Madteng
Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
Brazilian Neurosurgery
glioblastoma
extension of resection
survival analysis
propensity score
author_facet Thara Tunthanathip
Suphavadee Madteng
author_sort Thara Tunthanathip
title Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
title_short Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
title_full Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
title_fullStr Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the Extent of Resection on Survival Outcome in Glioblastoma: Propensity Score Approach
title_sort effect of the extent of resection on survival outcome in glioblastoma: propensity score approach
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
series Brazilian Neurosurgery
issn 0103-5355
2359-5922
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the extent of resection (EOR) on survival outcome using propensity score-based approaches. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) and propensity score regression adjustment were used in the matched and unmatched dataset, respectively. Therefore, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox's regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of the EOR on survival outcomes. Results One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included for analyzes. The total tumor resection in the unmatched dataset was 22.6% of all cases. Using PSM, incomplete tumor resection had an unfavorable survival outcome when compared with total tumor resection (hazard ratio (HR) 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72–4.94). Additionally, biopsy and partial tumor resection were significantly associated with poor prognosis when compared with total tumor resection using propensity score regression adjustment (HR of biopsy 1.89, 95%CI 1.13–3.16 and HR of partial resection 1.89, 95%CI 1.28–2.80). Conclusions Patients with total tumor resection tend to have a more favorable prognosis than patients with partial tumor resection. The propensity score-based analysis is an alternative approach to evaluate the effect of an intervention that has limitations to perform a randomized controlled trial.
topic glioblastoma
extension of resection
survival analysis
propensity score
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1718424
work_keys_str_mv AT tharatunthanathip effectoftheextentofresectiononsurvivaloutcomeinglioblastomapropensityscoreapproach
AT suphavadeemadteng effectoftheextentofresectiononsurvivaloutcomeinglioblastomapropensityscoreapproach
_version_ 1721355783036207104