Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.

BACKGROUND:One quarter of the global population is of menstruating age, yet menstruation is shrouded in discrimination and taboos. Disability also carries stigma, so disabled people may face layers of discrimination when they are menstruating. The objective of the review is to assess the menstrual h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane Wilbur, Belen Torondel, Shaffa Hameed, Thérèse Mahon, Hannah Kuper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210974
id doaj-997ddff65b724809bd204e8513946ced
record_format Article
spelling doaj-997ddff65b724809bd204e8513946ced2021-03-03T20:54:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021097410.1371/journal.pone.0210974Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.Jane WilburBelen TorondelShaffa HameedThérèse MahonHannah KuperBACKGROUND:One quarter of the global population is of menstruating age, yet menstruation is shrouded in discrimination and taboos. Disability also carries stigma, so disabled people may face layers of discrimination when they are menstruating. The objective of the review is to assess the menstrual hygiene requirements of disabled people, the barriers they face, and the available interventions to help them manage their menstruation hygienically and with dignity. METHODS:Eligible studies, gathered across all countries, were identified by conducting searches across four databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health) in May 2017, with alerts set on each database to highlight new titles added until April 2018. Eligible studies incorporated analyses relevant to menstruating disabled people and/or how their carers provide support during their menstrual cycle. RESULTS:The 22 studies included were published since 1976; the majority after 2010 (n = 12; 55%). One study was a quasi-experiment; all others were observational. Most studies (n = 15; 68%) were from high income countries and most (n = 17; 77%) focused on people with intellectual impairments, so the review findings focus on this group and their carers. Outcomes investigated include choice and preference of menstrual product, ability to manage menstrual hygiene and coping strategies applied. Barriers faced included a lack of standardised guidance for professional carers; a lack of menstruation training, information and support provided to people with intellectual impairments and their carers; a lack of understanding of severity of symptoms experienced by people with intellectual impairments, the high cost of menstrual products and lack of appropriate options for people with physical impairments. Few interventions were found, and strategies for menstrual hygiene management applied by carers of persons with intellectual impairments include limiting the disabled person's movements when menstruating and suppressing their menstruation. CONCLUSIONS:Little evidence was identified on the requirements of disabled people and their carers in managing their menstruation, and only one intervention, but a range of barriers were identified. This gap in evidence is important, as the consequences of failing to meet menstrual hygiene needs of disabled people includes shame, social isolation, and even sterilisation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO CRD42018095497.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210974
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jane Wilbur
Belen Torondel
Shaffa Hameed
Thérèse Mahon
Hannah Kuper
spellingShingle Jane Wilbur
Belen Torondel
Shaffa Hameed
Thérèse Mahon
Hannah Kuper
Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jane Wilbur
Belen Torondel
Shaffa Hameed
Thérèse Mahon
Hannah Kuper
author_sort Jane Wilbur
title Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
title_short Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
title_full Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
title_fullStr Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
title_sort systematic review of menstrual hygiene management requirements, its barriers and strategies for disabled people.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description BACKGROUND:One quarter of the global population is of menstruating age, yet menstruation is shrouded in discrimination and taboos. Disability also carries stigma, so disabled people may face layers of discrimination when they are menstruating. The objective of the review is to assess the menstrual hygiene requirements of disabled people, the barriers they face, and the available interventions to help them manage their menstruation hygienically and with dignity. METHODS:Eligible studies, gathered across all countries, were identified by conducting searches across four databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health) in May 2017, with alerts set on each database to highlight new titles added until April 2018. Eligible studies incorporated analyses relevant to menstruating disabled people and/or how their carers provide support during their menstrual cycle. RESULTS:The 22 studies included were published since 1976; the majority after 2010 (n = 12; 55%). One study was a quasi-experiment; all others were observational. Most studies (n = 15; 68%) were from high income countries and most (n = 17; 77%) focused on people with intellectual impairments, so the review findings focus on this group and their carers. Outcomes investigated include choice and preference of menstrual product, ability to manage menstrual hygiene and coping strategies applied. Barriers faced included a lack of standardised guidance for professional carers; a lack of menstruation training, information and support provided to people with intellectual impairments and their carers; a lack of understanding of severity of symptoms experienced by people with intellectual impairments, the high cost of menstrual products and lack of appropriate options for people with physical impairments. Few interventions were found, and strategies for menstrual hygiene management applied by carers of persons with intellectual impairments include limiting the disabled person's movements when menstruating and suppressing their menstruation. CONCLUSIONS:Little evidence was identified on the requirements of disabled people and their carers in managing their menstruation, and only one intervention, but a range of barriers were identified. This gap in evidence is important, as the consequences of failing to meet menstrual hygiene needs of disabled people includes shame, social isolation, and even sterilisation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO CRD42018095497.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210974
work_keys_str_mv AT janewilbur systematicreviewofmenstrualhygienemanagementrequirementsitsbarriersandstrategiesfordisabledpeople
AT belentorondel systematicreviewofmenstrualhygienemanagementrequirementsitsbarriersandstrategiesfordisabledpeople
AT shaffahameed systematicreviewofmenstrualhygienemanagementrequirementsitsbarriersandstrategiesfordisabledpeople
AT theresemahon systematicreviewofmenstrualhygienemanagementrequirementsitsbarriersandstrategiesfordisabledpeople
AT hannahkuper systematicreviewofmenstrualhygienemanagementrequirementsitsbarriersandstrategiesfordisabledpeople
_version_ 1714819916757991424