Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young wome...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fairley Christopher K, Parker Rhian, Gunn Jane M, Pavlin Natasha L, Hocking Jane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-09-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/221
id doaj-99b92513e8b4458291854d05aacab650
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99b92513e8b4458291854d05aacab6502020-11-24T21:41:41ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582006-09-016122110.1186/1471-2458-6-221Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literatureFairley Christopher KParker RhianGunn Jane MPavlin Natasha LHocking Jane<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Online databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/221
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fairley Christopher K
Parker Rhian
Gunn Jane M
Pavlin Natasha L
Hocking Jane
spellingShingle Fairley Christopher K
Parker Rhian
Gunn Jane M
Pavlin Natasha L
Hocking Jane
Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
BMC Public Health
author_facet Fairley Christopher K
Parker Rhian
Gunn Jane M
Pavlin Natasha L
Hocking Jane
author_sort Fairley Christopher K
title Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_short Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_full Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_sort implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? a systematic review of the literature
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2006-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with <it>Chlamydia trachomatis</it>.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Online databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/221
work_keys_str_mv AT fairleychristopherk implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT parkerrhian implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gunnjanem implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT pavlinnatashal implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hockingjane implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1725920472568168448