Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzam |
id |
doaj-99c36aabea964624b59dd0a7d3f7e348 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-99c36aabea964624b59dd0a7d3f7e3482021-07-02T08:52:51ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation1110-161X2090-32352019-01-0146314114710.4103/err.err_16_18Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathyMona ZamzamAhmed El YasakiNermin ElGarabawyLamiaa Emad E El GhandourObjective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A clinical assessment was performed for all patients including pain scoring by the visual analog scale and full shoulder examination at the start of the study and 6 weeks later. Shoulder ultrasound was performed at the start of the study. Fifteen patients received four sessions of radial shockwave therapy (Intelect Radial Shockwave, UK) 3 bar pressure, 2000 pulses, 20 Hz. Fifteen patients received a single ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection (1 ml triamcinolone 40 mg and 1 ml lidocaine). Results Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief (visual analog scale) and clinical examination: tenderness, shoulder range of motion, and muscle power. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion Radial shockwave therapy has no additional benefit over ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the short term in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzamchronic supraspinatus tendinopathylocal steroid injectionshockwave therapy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mona Zamzam Ahmed El Yasaki Nermin ElGarabawy Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour |
spellingShingle |
Mona Zamzam Ahmed El Yasaki Nermin ElGarabawy Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy local steroid injection shockwave therapy |
author_facet |
Mona Zamzam Ahmed El Yasaki Nermin ElGarabawy Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour |
author_sort |
Mona Zamzam |
title |
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
title_short |
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
title_full |
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
title_fullStr |
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
title_sort |
shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation |
issn |
1110-161X 2090-3235 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.
Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A clinical assessment was performed for all patients including pain scoring by the visual analog scale and full shoulder examination at the start of the study and 6 weeks later. Shoulder ultrasound was performed at the start of the study. Fifteen patients received four sessions of radial shockwave therapy (Intelect Radial Shockwave, UK) 3 bar pressure, 2000 pulses, 20 Hz. Fifteen patients received a single ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection (1 ml triamcinolone 40 mg and 1 ml lidocaine).
Results Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief (visual analog scale) and clinical examination: tenderness, shoulder range of motion, and muscle power. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups.
Conclusion Radial shockwave therapy has no additional benefit over ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the short term in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. |
topic |
chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy local steroid injection shockwave therapy |
url |
http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzam |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monazamzam shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy AT ahmedelyasaki shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy AT nerminelgarabawy shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy AT lamiaaemadeelghandour shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy |
_version_ |
1721333976197496832 |