Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona Zamzam, Ahmed El Yasaki, Nermin ElGarabawy, Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-01-01
Series:Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzam
id doaj-99c36aabea964624b59dd0a7d3f7e348
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99c36aabea964624b59dd0a7d3f7e3482021-07-02T08:52:51ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation1110-161X2090-32352019-01-0146314114710.4103/err.err_16_18Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathyMona ZamzamAhmed El YasakiNermin ElGarabawyLamiaa Emad E El GhandourObjective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A clinical assessment was performed for all patients including pain scoring by the visual analog scale and full shoulder examination at the start of the study and 6 weeks later. Shoulder ultrasound was performed at the start of the study. Fifteen patients received four sessions of radial shockwave therapy (Intelect Radial Shockwave, UK) 3 bar pressure, 2000 pulses, 20 Hz. Fifteen patients received a single ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection (1 ml triamcinolone 40 mg and 1 ml lidocaine). Results Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief (visual analog scale) and clinical examination: tenderness, shoulder range of motion, and muscle power. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion Radial shockwave therapy has no additional benefit over ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the short term in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzamchronic supraspinatus tendinopathylocal steroid injectionshockwave therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mona Zamzam
Ahmed El Yasaki
Nermin ElGarabawy
Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour
spellingShingle Mona Zamzam
Ahmed El Yasaki
Nermin ElGarabawy
Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour
Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
local steroid injection
shockwave therapy
author_facet Mona Zamzam
Ahmed El Yasaki
Nermin ElGarabawy
Lamiaa Emad E El Ghandour
author_sort Mona Zamzam
title Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
title_short Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
title_full Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
title_fullStr Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
title_sort shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
publisher SpringerOpen
series Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
issn 1110-161X
2090-3235
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Patients and methods This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A clinical assessment was performed for all patients including pain scoring by the visual analog scale and full shoulder examination at the start of the study and 6 weeks later. Shoulder ultrasound was performed at the start of the study. Fifteen patients received four sessions of radial shockwave therapy (Intelect Radial Shockwave, UK) 3 bar pressure, 2000 pulses, 20 Hz. Fifteen patients received a single ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection (1 ml triamcinolone 40 mg and 1 ml lidocaine). Results Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief (visual analog scale) and clinical examination: tenderness, shoulder range of motion, and muscle power. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion Radial shockwave therapy has no additional benefit over ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the short term in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.
topic chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy
local steroid injection
shockwave therapy
url http://www.err.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-161X;year=2019;volume=46;issue=3;spage=141;epage=147;aulast=Zamzam
work_keys_str_mv AT monazamzam shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy
AT ahmedelyasaki shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy
AT nerminelgarabawy shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy
AT lamiaaemadeelghandour shockwavetherapyversuslocalsteroidinjectioninchronicsupraspinatustendinopathy
_version_ 1721333976197496832