Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy

Background: Clinical findings suggest that the use of rectal culture-guided antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the infection rate following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx). Methods: A decision-analytic model was designed to compare the outcomes of TRUSBx performed with (rectal cul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chi-kong Li, Brian C.Y. Tong, Joyce H.S. You
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-02-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971215002866
id doaj-99d1fc75dd794364bb7c8b9eac2386d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99d1fc75dd794364bb7c8b9eac2386d72020-11-24T23:44:51ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97121878-35112016-02-0143C71210.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.005Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsyChi-kong LiBrian C.Y. TongJoyce H.S. YouBackground: Clinical findings suggest that the use of rectal culture-guided antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the infection rate following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx). Methods: A decision-analytic model was designed to compare the outcomes of TRUSBx performed with (rectal culture-guided group) and without (standard ciprofloxacin prophylaxis) rectal swab culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis in Hong Kong. The post-biopsy infection rate, infection-related costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost for infection, and incremental cost per QALY saved (ICER) were assessed. Model inputs were retrieved from local epidemiology data and the medical literature. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model results. Results: Base-case analysis showed that the infection rate in the culture-guided group was reduced from 2.42% to 0.23% and saved 0.0002 QALYs, with a lower cost (USD 31.4 versus USD 55.6) (USD 1 = HKD 7.8). The number needed to screen to prevent an infection episode was 45.7. The hospital days avoided per 100 patients using culture-guided prophylaxis was 7.08 days. The relative effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis versus standard prophylaxis in carriers and non-carriers of FQ-resistant rectal flora were identified as potential influencing factors. In 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations, ICERs of the culture-guided group were below the willingness-to-pay threshold 99.12% of the time. Conclusions: Using rectal culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for men undergoing TRUSBx appears to be a cost-saving strategy to avert post-biopsy infection and QALY loss in Hong Kong.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971215002866Antimicrobial prophylaxisRectal cultureProstate biopsyPost-biopsy infectionCost-effectiveness analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chi-kong Li
Brian C.Y. Tong
Joyce H.S. You
spellingShingle Chi-kong Li
Brian C.Y. Tong
Joyce H.S. You
Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial prophylaxis
Rectal culture
Prostate biopsy
Post-biopsy infection
Cost-effectiveness analysis
author_facet Chi-kong Li
Brian C.Y. Tong
Joyce H.S. You
author_sort Chi-kong Li
title Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
title_short Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
title_full Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
title_sort cost-effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of infections after prostate biopsy
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1201-9712
1878-3511
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Background: Clinical findings suggest that the use of rectal culture-guided antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the infection rate following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSBx). Methods: A decision-analytic model was designed to compare the outcomes of TRUSBx performed with (rectal culture-guided group) and without (standard ciprofloxacin prophylaxis) rectal swab culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis in Hong Kong. The post-biopsy infection rate, infection-related costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost for infection, and incremental cost per QALY saved (ICER) were assessed. Model inputs were retrieved from local epidemiology data and the medical literature. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model results. Results: Base-case analysis showed that the infection rate in the culture-guided group was reduced from 2.42% to 0.23% and saved 0.0002 QALYs, with a lower cost (USD 31.4 versus USD 55.6) (USD 1 = HKD 7.8). The number needed to screen to prevent an infection episode was 45.7. The hospital days avoided per 100 patients using culture-guided prophylaxis was 7.08 days. The relative effectiveness of culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis versus standard prophylaxis in carriers and non-carriers of FQ-resistant rectal flora were identified as potential influencing factors. In 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations, ICERs of the culture-guided group were below the willingness-to-pay threshold 99.12% of the time. Conclusions: Using rectal culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis for men undergoing TRUSBx appears to be a cost-saving strategy to avert post-biopsy infection and QALY loss in Hong Kong.
topic Antimicrobial prophylaxis
Rectal culture
Prostate biopsy
Post-biopsy infection
Cost-effectiveness analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971215002866
work_keys_str_mv AT chikongli costeffectivenessofcultureguidedantimicrobialprophylaxisforthepreventionofinfectionsafterprostatebiopsy
AT briancytong costeffectivenessofcultureguidedantimicrobialprophylaxisforthepreventionofinfectionsafterprostatebiopsy
AT joycehsyou costeffectivenessofcultureguidedantimicrobialprophylaxisforthepreventionofinfectionsafterprostatebiopsy
_version_ 1725498182647939072