Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies

Analyzing human gait with inertial sensors provides valuable insights into a wide range of health impairments, including many musculoskeletal and neurological diseases. A representative and reliable assessment of gait requires continuous monitoring over long periods and ideally takes place in the su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias  Tietsch, Amir Muaremi, Ieuan Clay, Felix Kluge, Holger Hoefling, Martin Ullrich, Arne Küderle, Bjoern M. Eskofier, Arne Müller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Karger Publishers 2020-11-01
Series:Digital Biomarkers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511611
id doaj-99e86aab403f448cb5c5222e9f9c58e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99e86aab403f448cb5c5222e9f9c58e62020-12-23T15:11:39ZengKarger PublishersDigital Biomarkers2504-110X2020-11-0141505810.1159/000511611511611Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical StudiesMatthias  TietschAmir MuaremiIeuan ClayFelix KlugeHolger HoeflingMartin UllrichArne KüderleBjoern M. EskofierArne MüllerAnalyzing human gait with inertial sensors provides valuable insights into a wide range of health impairments, including many musculoskeletal and neurological diseases. A representative and reliable assessment of gait requires continuous monitoring over long periods and ideally takes place in the subjects’ habitual environment (real-world). An inconsistent sensor wearing position can affect gait characterization and influence clinical study results, thus clinical study protocols are typically highly proscriptive, instructing all participants to wear the sensor in a uniform manner. This restrictive approach improves data quality but reduces overall adherence. In this work, we analyze the impact of altering the sensor wearing position around the waist on sensor signal and step detection. We demonstrate that an asymmetrically worn sensor leads to additional odd-harmonic frequency components in the frequency spectrum. We propose a robust solution for step detection based on autocorrelation to overcome sensor position variation (sensitivity = 0.99, precision = 0.99). The proposed solution reduces the impact of inconsistent sensor positioning on gait characterization in clinical studies, thus providing more flexibility to protocol implementation and more freedom to participants to wear the sensor in the position most comfortable to them. This work is a first step towards truly position-agnostic gait assessment in clinical settings.https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511611step detectiongait monitoringautocorrelationinertial sensorwaist-worn
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthias  Tietsch
Amir Muaremi
Ieuan Clay
Felix Kluge
Holger Hoefling
Martin Ullrich
Arne Küderle
Bjoern M. Eskofier
Arne Müller
spellingShingle Matthias  Tietsch
Amir Muaremi
Ieuan Clay
Felix Kluge
Holger Hoefling
Martin Ullrich
Arne Küderle
Bjoern M. Eskofier
Arne Müller
Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
Digital Biomarkers
step detection
gait monitoring
autocorrelation
inertial sensor
waist-worn
author_facet Matthias  Tietsch
Amir Muaremi
Ieuan Clay
Felix Kluge
Holger Hoefling
Martin Ullrich
Arne Küderle
Bjoern M. Eskofier
Arne Müller
author_sort Matthias  Tietsch
title Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
title_short Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
title_full Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
title_fullStr Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
title_full_unstemmed Robust Step Detection from Different Waist-Worn Sensor Positions: Implications for Clinical Studies
title_sort robust step detection from different waist-worn sensor positions: implications for clinical studies
publisher Karger Publishers
series Digital Biomarkers
issn 2504-110X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Analyzing human gait with inertial sensors provides valuable insights into a wide range of health impairments, including many musculoskeletal and neurological diseases. A representative and reliable assessment of gait requires continuous monitoring over long periods and ideally takes place in the subjects’ habitual environment (real-world). An inconsistent sensor wearing position can affect gait characterization and influence clinical study results, thus clinical study protocols are typically highly proscriptive, instructing all participants to wear the sensor in a uniform manner. This restrictive approach improves data quality but reduces overall adherence. In this work, we analyze the impact of altering the sensor wearing position around the waist on sensor signal and step detection. We demonstrate that an asymmetrically worn sensor leads to additional odd-harmonic frequency components in the frequency spectrum. We propose a robust solution for step detection based on autocorrelation to overcome sensor position variation (sensitivity = 0.99, precision = 0.99). The proposed solution reduces the impact of inconsistent sensor positioning on gait characterization in clinical studies, thus providing more flexibility to protocol implementation and more freedom to participants to wear the sensor in the position most comfortable to them. This work is a first step towards truly position-agnostic gait assessment in clinical settings.
topic step detection
gait monitoring
autocorrelation
inertial sensor
waist-worn
url https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/511611
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiastietsch robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT amirmuaremi robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT ieuanclay robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT felixkluge robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT holgerhoefling robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT martinullrich robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT arnekuderle robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT bjoernmeskofier robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
AT arnemuller robuststepdetectionfromdifferentwaistwornsensorpositionsimplicationsforclinicalstudies
_version_ 1724372578014855168