A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The recommendations outlined in the latest guidelines published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) regarding the proper duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with intra-a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gazzotti Filippo, Di Saverio Salomone, Ercolani Giorgio, Ansaloni Luca, Catena Fausto, Coccolini Federico, Lazzareschi Daniel, Pinna Antonio D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/42
id doaj-99fa0e3ec8824506bc5a16afef84c2df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-99fa0e3ec8824506bc5a16afef84c2df2020-11-25T03:40:27ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2011-04-011114210.1186/1471-230X-11-42A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)Gazzotti FilippoDi Saverio SalomoneErcolani GiorgioAnsaloni LucaCatena FaustoCoccolini FedericoLazzareschi DanielPinna Antonio D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The recommendations outlined in the latest guidelines published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) regarding the proper duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with intra-abdominal infections are limited and non-specific. This ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic of optimal duration of therapy. It is well known that the overuse of antibiotics has several important consequences such as increased treatment costs, reduced clinical efficacy, and above all, the increased emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Ampicillin-Sulbactam is a commonly used "first line" antibiotic for intra-abdominal infections. Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>This study is a prospective multi-center randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Departments of General, Emergency, and Transplant Surgery of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital in Bologna, Italy, in the General Surgery Department of the Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italy, and in the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department of Maggiore Hospital in Bologna, Italy, and will be conducted by all surgeons willing to participate in the study. The inclusion period of the study will take approximately two years before the planned number of 142 enrolled patients is reached.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended both as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines. As one of the discussed topic is the optimal duration of the antibiotic therapy and this ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic, the present study aims for obtain precise data.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00630513">NCT00630513</a></p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/42
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gazzotti Filippo
Di Saverio Salomone
Ercolani Giorgio
Ansaloni Luca
Catena Fausto
Coccolini Federico
Lazzareschi Daniel
Pinna Antonio D
spellingShingle Gazzotti Filippo
Di Saverio Salomone
Ercolani Giorgio
Ansaloni Luca
Catena Fausto
Coccolini Federico
Lazzareschi Daniel
Pinna Antonio D
A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
BMC Gastroenterology
author_facet Gazzotti Filippo
Di Saverio Salomone
Ercolani Giorgio
Ansaloni Luca
Catena Fausto
Coccolini Federico
Lazzareschi Daniel
Pinna Antonio D
author_sort Gazzotti Filippo
title A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
title_short A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
title_full A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
title_fullStr A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
title_sort prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of ertapenem 3 days versus ampicillin - sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (t.e.a. study: three days ertapenem vs three days ampicillin-sulbactam)
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2011-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The recommendations outlined in the latest guidelines published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) regarding the proper duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with intra-abdominal infections are limited and non-specific. This ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic of optimal duration of therapy. It is well known that the overuse of antibiotics has several important consequences such as increased treatment costs, reduced clinical efficacy, and above all, the increased emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Ampicillin-Sulbactam is a commonly used "first line" antibiotic for intra-abdominal infections. Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>This study is a prospective multi-center randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Departments of General, Emergency, and Transplant Surgery of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital in Bologna, Italy, in the General Surgery Department of the Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italy, and in the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department of Maggiore Hospital in Bologna, Italy, and will be conducted by all surgeons willing to participate in the study. The inclusion period of the study will take approximately two years before the planned number of 142 enrolled patients is reached.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended both as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines. As one of the discussed topic is the optimal duration of the antibiotic therapy and this ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic, the present study aims for obtain precise data.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00630513">NCT00630513</a></p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/42
work_keys_str_mv AT gazzottifilippo aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT disaveriosalomone aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT ercolanigiorgio aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT ansaloniluca aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT catenafausto aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT coccolinifederico aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT lazzareschidaniel aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT pinnaantoniod aprospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT gazzottifilippo prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT disaveriosalomone prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT ercolanigiorgio prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT ansaloniluca prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT catenafausto prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT coccolinifederico prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT lazzareschidaniel prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
AT pinnaantoniod prospectivemulticentrerandomizedclinicalstudytocomparetheefficacyandsafetyofertapenem3daysversusampicillinsulbactam3daysinthetreatmentoflocalizedcommunityacquiredintraabdominalinfectionteastudythreedaysertapenemvsthreedaysampicillinsulbactam
_version_ 1724534841573113856