A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Implant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matteo Albertini, Federico Herrero-Climent, Carmen María Díaz-Castro, Jose Nart, Ana Fernández-Palacín, José Vicente Ríos-Santos, Mariano Herrero-Climent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223
id doaj-9a4899017cc84aef9fd094526bbbd104
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a4899017cc84aef9fd094526bbbd1042021-01-30T00:05:21ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-01-01181223122310.3390/ijerph18031223A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical TrialMatteo Albertini0Federico Herrero-Climent1Carmen María Díaz-Castro2Jose Nart3Ana Fernández-Palacín4José Vicente Ríos-Santos5Mariano Herrero-Climent6Department of Periodontology, Universitat International de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, SpainPrivate Practice, Dr. Fleming, 54-1º Izq, (Clínica Dental Herrero Climent), 28036 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda Sanchez Pizjuán S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Periodontology, Universitat International de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda Sanchez Pizjuán S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Periodontics and Dental Implants, School of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainPorto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, PortugalImplant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one year of follow-up. Moreover, a comparison of clinical data regarding implant survival, implant stability, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was conducted. <b>Methods:</b> Klockner<sup>®</sup> VEGA<sup>®</sup> implants with a ContacTi<sup>®</sup> surface were placed in partially edentulous patients in the posterior areas. Group A received an immediately loaded prosthesis (one week) and Group B received an early-loaded prosthesis (four weeks). All abutments were placed at the time of surgery. Radiographic and clinical data were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one patients were treated (35 implants). No implants were lost during the study. The final marginal bone level did not show differences between groups. The bone loss at 12 months at the implant level was 0.00 mm for both groups (median). The final implant quotient stability (ISQ) values did not differ between groups (median 73 and 70.25), nor did the other clinical parameters or PROMs. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that neither of the loading protocols with the implants used influenced the marginal bone level—not the osseointegration rate, clinical conditions, or PROMs.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223immediate loadingearly loadingdental implantsbone–implant interfaceosseointegration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matteo Albertini
Federico Herrero-Climent
Carmen María Díaz-Castro
Jose Nart
Ana Fernández-Palacín
José Vicente Ríos-Santos
Mariano Herrero-Climent
spellingShingle Matteo Albertini
Federico Herrero-Climent
Carmen María Díaz-Castro
Jose Nart
Ana Fernández-Palacín
José Vicente Ríos-Santos
Mariano Herrero-Climent
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
immediate loading
early loading
dental implants
bone–implant interface
osseointegration
author_facet Matteo Albertini
Federico Herrero-Climent
Carmen María Díaz-Castro
Jose Nart
Ana Fernández-Palacín
José Vicente Ríos-Santos
Mariano Herrero-Climent
author_sort Matteo Albertini
title A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort radiographic and clinical comparison of immediate vs. early loading (4 weeks) of implants with a new thermo-chemically treated surface: a randomized clinical trial
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Implant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one year of follow-up. Moreover, a comparison of clinical data regarding implant survival, implant stability, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was conducted. <b>Methods:</b> Klockner<sup>®</sup> VEGA<sup>®</sup> implants with a ContacTi<sup>®</sup> surface were placed in partially edentulous patients in the posterior areas. Group A received an immediately loaded prosthesis (one week) and Group B received an early-loaded prosthesis (four weeks). All abutments were placed at the time of surgery. Radiographic and clinical data were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one patients were treated (35 implants). No implants were lost during the study. The final marginal bone level did not show differences between groups. The bone loss at 12 months at the implant level was 0.00 mm for both groups (median). The final implant quotient stability (ISQ) values did not differ between groups (median 73 and 70.25), nor did the other clinical parameters or PROMs. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that neither of the loading protocols with the implants used influenced the marginal bone level—not the osseointegration rate, clinical conditions, or PROMs.
topic immediate loading
early loading
dental implants
bone–implant interface
osseointegration
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223
work_keys_str_mv AT matteoalbertini aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT federicoherrerocliment aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carmenmariadiazcastro aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT josenart aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT anafernandezpalacin aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT josevicenteriossantos aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marianoherrerocliment aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT matteoalbertini radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT federicoherrerocliment radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carmenmariadiazcastro radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT josenart radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT anafernandezpalacin radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT josevicenteriossantos radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marianoherrerocliment radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724318416104325120