A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Implant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223 |
id |
doaj-9a4899017cc84aef9fd094526bbbd104 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9a4899017cc84aef9fd094526bbbd1042021-01-30T00:05:21ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-01-01181223122310.3390/ijerph18031223A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical TrialMatteo Albertini0Federico Herrero-Climent1Carmen María Díaz-Castro2Jose Nart3Ana Fernández-Palacín4José Vicente Ríos-Santos5Mariano Herrero-Climent6Department of Periodontology, Universitat International de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, SpainPrivate Practice, Dr. Fleming, 54-1º Izq, (Clínica Dental Herrero Climent), 28036 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda Sanchez Pizjuán S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Periodontology, Universitat International de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda Sanchez Pizjuán S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Periodontics and Dental Implants, School of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, SpainPorto Dental Institute, 4150-518 Porto, PortugalImplant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one year of follow-up. Moreover, a comparison of clinical data regarding implant survival, implant stability, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was conducted. <b>Methods:</b> Klockner<sup>®</sup> VEGA<sup>®</sup> implants with a ContacTi<sup>®</sup> surface were placed in partially edentulous patients in the posterior areas. Group A received an immediately loaded prosthesis (one week) and Group B received an early-loaded prosthesis (four weeks). All abutments were placed at the time of surgery. Radiographic and clinical data were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one patients were treated (35 implants). No implants were lost during the study. The final marginal bone level did not show differences between groups. The bone loss at 12 months at the implant level was 0.00 mm for both groups (median). The final implant quotient stability (ISQ) values did not differ between groups (median 73 and 70.25), nor did the other clinical parameters or PROMs. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that neither of the loading protocols with the implants used influenced the marginal bone level—not the osseointegration rate, clinical conditions, or PROMs.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223immediate loadingearly loadingdental implantsbone–implant interfaceosseointegration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matteo Albertini Federico Herrero-Climent Carmen María Díaz-Castro Jose Nart Ana Fernández-Palacín José Vicente Ríos-Santos Mariano Herrero-Climent |
spellingShingle |
Matteo Albertini Federico Herrero-Climent Carmen María Díaz-Castro Jose Nart Ana Fernández-Palacín José Vicente Ríos-Santos Mariano Herrero-Climent A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health immediate loading early loading dental implants bone–implant interface osseointegration |
author_facet |
Matteo Albertini Federico Herrero-Climent Carmen María Díaz-Castro Jose Nart Ana Fernández-Palacín José Vicente Ríos-Santos Mariano Herrero-Climent |
author_sort |
Matteo Albertini |
title |
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short |
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full |
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr |
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort |
radiographic and clinical comparison of immediate vs. early loading (4 weeks) of implants with a new thermo-chemically treated surface: a randomized clinical trial |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Implant dentistry has evolved over time, resulting in better treatment outcomes for both patients and clinicians. The aim of this trial was to test whether the immediate loading of implants with a platform-switching design influences the marginal bone level, compared to four-week loading, after one year of follow-up. Moreover, a comparison of clinical data regarding implant survival, implant stability, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) was conducted. <b>Methods:</b> Klockner<sup>®</sup> VEGA<sup>®</sup> implants with a ContacTi<sup>®</sup> surface were placed in partially edentulous patients in the posterior areas. Group A received an immediately loaded prosthesis (one week) and Group B received an early-loaded prosthesis (four weeks). All abutments were placed at the time of surgery. Radiographic and clinical data were recorded. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-one patients were treated (35 implants). No implants were lost during the study. The final marginal bone level did not show differences between groups. The bone loss at 12 months at the implant level was 0.00 mm for both groups (median). The final implant quotient stability (ISQ) values did not differ between groups (median 73 and 70.25), nor did the other clinical parameters or PROMs. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that neither of the loading protocols with the implants used influenced the marginal bone level—not the osseointegration rate, clinical conditions, or PROMs. |
topic |
immediate loading early loading dental implants bone–implant interface osseointegration |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1223 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matteoalbertini aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT federicoherrerocliment aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT carmenmariadiazcastro aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT josenart aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT anafernandezpalacin aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT josevicenteriossantos aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT marianoherrerocliment aradiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT matteoalbertini radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT federicoherrerocliment radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT carmenmariadiazcastro radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT josenart radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT anafernandezpalacin radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT josevicenteriossantos radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial AT marianoherrerocliment radiographicandclinicalcomparisonofimmediatevsearlyloading4weeksofimplantswithanewthermochemicallytreatedsurfacearandomizedclinicaltrial |
_version_ |
1724318416104325120 |