The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley

In Northern Ireland, the conflict between Unionists and Republicans, Catholic and Protestants saw its peak during the ‘Troubles' of 1969-1993. Today, after four decades of physical violence, the peace process has reached a successful ending and a war of words has finally replaced real war.   ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim Grego
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2010-03-01
Series:Altre Modernità
Subjects:
ESP
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/515
id doaj-9a629e9bff814b29bb84c67aa6b00f9c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a629e9bff814b29bb84c67aa6b00f9c2020-11-25T03:32:36ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoAltre Modernità2035-76802010-03-0103829410.13130/2035-7680/515462The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian PaisleyKim Grego0Università degli Studi di MilanoIn Northern Ireland, the conflict between Unionists and Republicans, Catholic and Protestants saw its peak during the ‘Troubles' of 1969-1993. Today, after four decades of physical violence, the peace process has reached a successful ending and a war of words has finally replaced real war.     To study how this move from arms to political debate occurred, a written corpus was collected, comprising annual party conference speeches given during the years 1993-2004 by the leaders of the two main and opposed political parties of Northern Ireland, Gerry Adams and Ian Paisley. By comparing these texts, it was possible to observe the development of their discourse from a short-term diachronic perspective.     A Critical Discourse Analysis approach is considered particularly suitable for dealing with political speeches, but contributions from different fields and disciplines are also considered.     The discourse analysis of the texts collected is supported by computer-aided analysis. Two aspects are being focussed on, in particular: 1) the use of same/different linguistic resources by the same orators to discuss same/different subjects over the years; and 2) the overall influence of language on politics, i.e. how words are used to exercise power.     It is hoped that the present study may help clarify aspects of the evolution of political discourse in Northern Ireland, in general, and of the argumentative skills and strategies of the above two politicians, in particular.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/515ESPPoliticaConflittoIrlandaPaisleyAdams
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kim Grego
spellingShingle Kim Grego
The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
Altre Modernità
ESP
Politica
Conflitto
Irlanda
Paisley
Adams
author_facet Kim Grego
author_sort Kim Grego
title The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
title_short The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
title_full The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
title_fullStr The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
title_full_unstemmed The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley
title_sort language of conflict in northern ireland: gerry adams vs. ian paisley
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Altre Modernità
issn 2035-7680
publishDate 2010-03-01
description In Northern Ireland, the conflict between Unionists and Republicans, Catholic and Protestants saw its peak during the ‘Troubles' of 1969-1993. Today, after four decades of physical violence, the peace process has reached a successful ending and a war of words has finally replaced real war.     To study how this move from arms to political debate occurred, a written corpus was collected, comprising annual party conference speeches given during the years 1993-2004 by the leaders of the two main and opposed political parties of Northern Ireland, Gerry Adams and Ian Paisley. By comparing these texts, it was possible to observe the development of their discourse from a short-term diachronic perspective.     A Critical Discourse Analysis approach is considered particularly suitable for dealing with political speeches, but contributions from different fields and disciplines are also considered.     The discourse analysis of the texts collected is supported by computer-aided analysis. Two aspects are being focussed on, in particular: 1) the use of same/different linguistic resources by the same orators to discuss same/different subjects over the years; and 2) the overall influence of language on politics, i.e. how words are used to exercise power.     It is hoped that the present study may help clarify aspects of the evolution of political discourse in Northern Ireland, in general, and of the argumentative skills and strategies of the above two politicians, in particular.
topic ESP
Politica
Conflitto
Irlanda
Paisley
Adams
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/515
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgrego thelanguageofconflictinnorthernirelandgerryadamsvsianpaisley
AT kimgrego languageofconflictinnorthernirelandgerryadamsvsianpaisley
_version_ 1724567216878256128