How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and assess the effects of changes in the Lithuanian trauma service from 2007 to 2012. We postulate that the implications derived from this study will be of importance to trauma policy planners and makers in Lithuania and throughout other countries of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Žilvinas Dambrauskas, Vytautas Aukštakalnis, Aurika Karbonskienė, Dmitrijus Kačiurinas, Jolanta Vokietienė, Robertas Lapka, Algimantas Pamerneckas, Narūnas Porvaneckas, Kęstutis Stašaitis, Nedas Jasinskas, Paulius Dobožinskas, Dinas Vaitkaitis, Raimundas Lunevičius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16301112
id doaj-9a67ad13ef2843eeabdb845411b4608e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a67ad13ef2843eeabdb845411b4608e2020-11-24T21:14:46ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2017-01-01531505710.1016/j.medici.2016.12.002How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012Žilvinas Dambrauskas0Vytautas Aukštakalnis1Aurika Karbonskienė2Dmitrijus Kačiurinas3Jolanta Vokietienė4Robertas Lapka5Algimantas Pamerneckas6Narūnas Porvaneckas7Kęstutis Stašaitis8Nedas Jasinskas9Paulius Dobožinskas10Dinas Vaitkaitis11Raimundas Lunevičius12Institute for Digestive Research, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaAlytus County S. Kudirkos Hospital, Alytus, LithuaniaRepublican Panevėžys Hospital, Panevėžys, LithuaniaRepublican Panevėžys Hospital, Panevėžys, LithuaniaCentre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Republican Vilnius University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaCentre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Republican Vilnius University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Disaster Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Disaster Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaEmergency General Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Merseyside and Cheshire Major Trauma Collaborative, University of Liverpool, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, United KingdomObjective: The aim of this study was to identify and assess the effects of changes in the Lithuanian trauma service from 2007 to 2012. We postulate that the implications derived from this study will be of importance to trauma policy planners and makers in Lithuania and throughout other countries of Eastern and Central Europe. Materials and methods: Out of 10,390 trauma admissions to four trauma centers in 2007, 294 patients (2.8%) were randomly selected for the first arm of a representative study sample. Similarly, of 9918 trauma admissions in 2012, 250 (2.5%) were randomly chosen for comparison in the study arm. Only cases with a diagnosis falling into the ICD-10 “S” and “T” codes were included. A survey of whom regarding changes in quality of trauma care from 2007 to 2012 was carried out by emergency medical service (EMS) providers. Results: The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) mean value was 7.45 ± 1.04 for the 2007 year arm; it was 7.53 ± 0.93 for the 2012 year arm (P = 0.33). Mean time from the moment of a call from the site of the traumatic event to the patient's arrival at the trauma center did not differ between the arms of the sample: 49.95 min in 2007 vs. 51.6 min in 2012 (P = 0.81). An application of the operational procedures such as a cervical spine protection using a hard collar, oxygen therapy, infusion of intravenous fluids, and pain relief on the trauma scene was more frequent in 2012 than in 2007. Management of trauma patients in the emergency department improved regarding the availability of 24/7 computed tomography scanner facilities and an on-site radiographer. Time to CT-scanning was reduced by 38.8%, and time to decision-making was reduced by 16.5% in 2012. Conclusions: Changes in operational procedures in the Lithuanian pre-hospital care provision and management of trauma patients in emergency departments of trauma centers improved the efficiency of trauma care delivery over the 2007–2012 period.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16301112Trauma serviceEmergency medical serviceEmergency departmentTrauma centerTrauma system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Vytautas Aukštakalnis
Aurika Karbonskienė
Dmitrijus Kačiurinas
Jolanta Vokietienė
Robertas Lapka
Algimantas Pamerneckas
Narūnas Porvaneckas
Kęstutis Stašaitis
Nedas Jasinskas
Paulius Dobožinskas
Dinas Vaitkaitis
Raimundas Lunevičius
spellingShingle Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Vytautas Aukštakalnis
Aurika Karbonskienė
Dmitrijus Kačiurinas
Jolanta Vokietienė
Robertas Lapka
Algimantas Pamerneckas
Narūnas Porvaneckas
Kęstutis Stašaitis
Nedas Jasinskas
Paulius Dobožinskas
Dinas Vaitkaitis
Raimundas Lunevičius
How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
Medicina
Trauma service
Emergency medical service
Emergency department
Trauma center
Trauma system
author_facet Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Vytautas Aukštakalnis
Aurika Karbonskienė
Dmitrijus Kačiurinas
Jolanta Vokietienė
Robertas Lapka
Algimantas Pamerneckas
Narūnas Porvaneckas
Kęstutis Stašaitis
Nedas Jasinskas
Paulius Dobožinskas
Dinas Vaitkaitis
Raimundas Lunevičius
author_sort Žilvinas Dambrauskas
title How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
title_short How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
title_full How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
title_fullStr How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
title_full_unstemmed How the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: The assessment of and implications for Lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
title_sort how the changes in the system affect trauma care provision: the assessment of and implications for lithuanian trauma service performance in 2007–2012
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and assess the effects of changes in the Lithuanian trauma service from 2007 to 2012. We postulate that the implications derived from this study will be of importance to trauma policy planners and makers in Lithuania and throughout other countries of Eastern and Central Europe. Materials and methods: Out of 10,390 trauma admissions to four trauma centers in 2007, 294 patients (2.8%) were randomly selected for the first arm of a representative study sample. Similarly, of 9918 trauma admissions in 2012, 250 (2.5%) were randomly chosen for comparison in the study arm. Only cases with a diagnosis falling into the ICD-10 “S” and “T” codes were included. A survey of whom regarding changes in quality of trauma care from 2007 to 2012 was carried out by emergency medical service (EMS) providers. Results: The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) mean value was 7.45 ± 1.04 for the 2007 year arm; it was 7.53 ± 0.93 for the 2012 year arm (P = 0.33). Mean time from the moment of a call from the site of the traumatic event to the patient's arrival at the trauma center did not differ between the arms of the sample: 49.95 min in 2007 vs. 51.6 min in 2012 (P = 0.81). An application of the operational procedures such as a cervical spine protection using a hard collar, oxygen therapy, infusion of intravenous fluids, and pain relief on the trauma scene was more frequent in 2012 than in 2007. Management of trauma patients in the emergency department improved regarding the availability of 24/7 computed tomography scanner facilities and an on-site radiographer. Time to CT-scanning was reduced by 38.8%, and time to decision-making was reduced by 16.5% in 2012. Conclusions: Changes in operational procedures in the Lithuanian pre-hospital care provision and management of trauma patients in emergency departments of trauma centers improved the efficiency of trauma care delivery over the 2007–2012 period.
topic Trauma service
Emergency medical service
Emergency department
Trauma center
Trauma system
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X16301112
work_keys_str_mv AT zilvinasdambrauskas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT vytautasaukstakalnis howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT aurikakarbonskiene howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT dmitrijuskaciurinas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT jolantavokietiene howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT robertaslapka howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT algimantaspamerneckas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT narunasporvaneckas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT kestutisstasaitis howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT nedasjasinskas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT pauliusdobozinskas howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT dinasvaitkaitis howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
AT raimundaslunevicius howthechangesinthesystemaffecttraumacareprovisiontheassessmentofandimplicationsforlithuaniantraumaserviceperformancein20072012
_version_ 1716746230532407296