International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions

Background: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each Internat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Dudley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Scientific Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scidentj.com/article.asp?issn=2580-6548;year=2018;volume=2;issue=3;spage=85;epage=92;aulast=Dudley;type=0
id doaj-9a729a0365484281b686754770146960
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a729a0365484281b6867547701469602020-11-25T01:41:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsScientific Dental Journal2580-65482541-321X2018-01-0123859210.26912/sdj.v2i3.28302536International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussionsJames DudleyBackground: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each International College of Prosthodontists Conference from 1999 to 2017 and identify trends. Methods: Available ICP Conference Programs were sourced from the ICP Administration and the titles of all presentations reviewed and catalogued into one of 13 presentation categories. The number of presentations in each category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of presentations for each conference and statistically analyzed for trends throughout the study period. Results: 69.61% of all presentations from all conferences were categorized as one of implant dentistry; materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies; removable prosthodontics and edentulism; or fixed prosthodontics. 46.38% were categorized as implant dentistry or materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies. The frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry and medically compromised patients; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased (p<0.05) over the study period. Conclusion: The ICP Conference presentation titles reviewed from 1999 to 2017 maintained a focus on implant dentistry and materials, CAD- CAM and digital technologies alongside a diverse range of other topics. Throughout the study period, the frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of presentation of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased.http://www.scidentj.com/article.asp?issn=2580-6548;year=2018;volume=2;issue=3;spage=85;epage=92;aulast=Dudley;type=0International College of Prosthodontists Conferenceimplant dentistrymaterials and digital technologypresentationsprosthodontics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Dudley
spellingShingle James Dudley
International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
Scientific Dental Journal
International College of Prosthodontists Conference
implant dentistry
materials and digital technology
presentations
prosthodontics
author_facet James Dudley
author_sort James Dudley
title International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
title_short International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
title_full International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
title_fullStr International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
title_full_unstemmed International prosthodontics: Two decades of discussions
title_sort international prosthodontics: two decades of discussions
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Scientific Dental Journal
issn 2580-6548
2541-321X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background: The perception that the specialty of prosthodontics has changed over time is subjective and largely based on personal belief, with little data to uphold this view in the literature. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of presentation categories at each International College of Prosthodontists Conference from 1999 to 2017 and identify trends. Methods: Available ICP Conference Programs were sourced from the ICP Administration and the titles of all presentations reviewed and catalogued into one of 13 presentation categories. The number of presentations in each category was expressed as a percentage of the total number of presentations for each conference and statistically analyzed for trends throughout the study period. Results: 69.61% of all presentations from all conferences were categorized as one of implant dentistry; materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies; removable prosthodontics and edentulism; or fixed prosthodontics. 46.38% were categorized as implant dentistry or materials, CAD-CAM and digital technologies. The frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry and medically compromised patients; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased (p<0.05) over the study period. Conclusion: The ICP Conference presentation titles reviewed from 1999 to 2017 maintained a focus on implant dentistry and materials, CAD- CAM and digital technologies alongside a diverse range of other topics. Throughout the study period, the frequency of presentations of fixed prosthodontics significantly decreased while the frequency of presentation of implant dentistry; maxillo-facial prosthodontics; geriatric dentistry; and clinical case presentations and treatment planning significantly increased.
topic International College of Prosthodontists Conference
implant dentistry
materials and digital technology
presentations
prosthodontics
url http://www.scidentj.com/article.asp?issn=2580-6548;year=2018;volume=2;issue=3;spage=85;epage=92;aulast=Dudley;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesdudley internationalprosthodonticstwodecadesofdiscussions
_version_ 1725041359158509568