Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation
This essay stages a philosophical dialogue between one of Plato’s earliest and shortest works, Ion, and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe’s deconstructive reflections on Diderot’s paradox of the actor. It takes the rhapsodic practice of the ancient figure of Ion as a reference point for thinking about the pe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Performance Philosophy
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Performance Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/281 |
id |
doaj-9a8a636f7c664b9881db2937740f1e37 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9a8a636f7c664b9881db2937740f1e372020-11-25T03:08:27ZengPerformance PhilosophyPerformance Philosophy2057-71762020-02-015231633110.21476/PP.2020.52281169Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonationNiki Hadikoesoemo0KU LeuvenThis essay stages a philosophical dialogue between one of Plato’s earliest and shortest works, Ion, and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe’s deconstructive reflections on Diderot’s paradox of the actor. It takes the rhapsodic practice of the ancient figure of Ion as a reference point for thinking about the performer’s intoxicating nature and investigates its philosophical, bodily and psychological implications as well as its critical potential. It will proceed in three stages. The first part takes a detailed look at the absolute focal point of Ion, namely the analogy between the rhapsode’s intoxication and the Heraclean lodestone. The second part addresses the ‘logic’ of the magnet specifically from Ion’s point of view, which entails a critique of Socrates’ assumption of Ion being ‘out of his wits’ when he performs. The final part shows, with the help of Lacoue-Labarthe’s radicalization of Diderot’s paradox – the actor is nothing and everything at the same time – how Ion’s intoxicating impersonations can be considered an imperative for catharsis and critical intervention.https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/281actor's paradoxdeconstructionimpersonationrhapsodyperformative mimesisinterventionintoxication |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Niki Hadikoesoemo |
spellingShingle |
Niki Hadikoesoemo Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation Performance Philosophy actor's paradox deconstruction impersonation rhapsody performative mimesis intervention intoxication |
author_facet |
Niki Hadikoesoemo |
author_sort |
Niki Hadikoesoemo |
title |
Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation |
title_short |
Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation |
title_full |
Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation |
title_fullStr |
Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Altering Bodies: Thinking of intervention through impersonation |
title_sort |
altering bodies: thinking of intervention through impersonation |
publisher |
Performance Philosophy |
series |
Performance Philosophy |
issn |
2057-7176 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
This essay stages a philosophical dialogue between one of Plato’s earliest and shortest works, Ion, and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe’s deconstructive reflections on Diderot’s paradox of the actor. It takes the rhapsodic practice of the ancient figure of Ion as a reference point for thinking about the performer’s intoxicating nature and investigates its philosophical, bodily and psychological implications as well as its critical potential. It will proceed in three stages. The first part takes a detailed look at the absolute focal point of Ion, namely the analogy between the rhapsode’s intoxication and the Heraclean lodestone. The second part addresses the ‘logic’ of the magnet specifically from Ion’s point of view, which entails a critique of Socrates’ assumption of Ion being ‘out of his wits’ when he performs. The final part shows, with the help of Lacoue-Labarthe’s radicalization of Diderot’s paradox – the actor is nothing and everything at the same time – how Ion’s intoxicating impersonations can be considered an imperative for catharsis and critical intervention. |
topic |
actor's paradox deconstruction impersonation rhapsody performative mimesis intervention intoxication |
url |
https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/281 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikihadikoesoemo alteringbodiesthinkingofinterventionthroughimpersonation |
_version_ |
1724666358628614144 |