Characterization of the CD4 and CD8 T-cell response in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus kit

• Main Authors: Elisa Petruccioli, Teresa Chiacchio, Ilaria Pepponi, Valentina Vanini, Rocco Urso, Gilda Cuzzi, Lucia Barcellini, Fabrizio Palmieri, Daniela M Cirillo, Giuseppe Ippolito, Delia Goletti
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
• Series: International Journal of Mycobacteriology
• Subjects: IGRA; QUANTIFERON PLUS; Tuberculosis; CD4; CD8
• Online Access: http://www.ijmyco.org/article.asp?issn=2212-5531;year=2016;volume=5;issue=5;spage=25;epage=26;aulast=Petruccioli

Objective/background: QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) is an interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release assay designed to detect latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Although QFT-GIT has several advantages (mainly that it is not affected by the Bacille Calmette–Guérin vaccination), it has a poor sensitivity in immune-compromised individuals as it involves an immune response-based detection. Recently, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay has been proposed as a new generation of QFT-GIT. QFT-Plus includes two tubes, TB1 and TB2 with Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens to elicit a specific immune response. TB1 contains peptides derived from the antigens 6 kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6) and 10 kDa culture filtrate protein (CFP-10) (TB-7.7, present in QFT-GIT, has been removed), and it is designed to induce a specific CD4 T-cell response. TB2 contains newly designed peptides stimulating IFN-γ production by both CD4 and CD8 T cells. The additional peptides for eliciting CD8 T-cell responses have been included to increase the sensitivity of the test for LTBI detection. The aim of the study was to evaluate specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to the M. tuberculosis antigens contained within the QFT-Plus test by flow cytometry in individuals with active TB and LTBI. Methods: We enrolled 23 individuals with active TB and 30 individuals with LTBI. QFT-Plus assay and intracellular staining were performed. One million of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 1 ml of complete medium (RPMI 1640) were dispensed in QFT-Plus tubes. Following 16–24 h stimulation, antigen-specific T cells were characterized by flow cytometry evaluating CD4, CD8, CD3 markers, and IFN-γ production. For statistical analysis, nonparametric tests were performed. Results: We found that CD4 T-cell responses were induced by both TB1 and TB2. Differently, the CD8 T-cell response was mainly induced by TB2 and was significantly higher than that induced by TB1 (p = 0.01). The frequency of Mtb specific T-cells observed in individuals with active TB was significantly higher than in those with LTBI (p = 0.04). Finally, TB2-specific CD8 T-cell responses in individuals with active TB were associated with high radiological severity of lung lesions and microbiological diagnosis (based on M. tuberculosis isolation in sputum culture). Conclusion: This is the first characterization of CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses to QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 tubes in individuals with active TB and LTBI enrolled in a low TB-endemic country such as Italy. We demonstrated that the increased sensitivity is a consequence of the ability of TB2 to induce a CD8 T-cell response which is mainly associated with active TB. This assay has the potential to be very useful in conditions of immune depression due to CD4 T-cell impairments.