Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017

Introduction.The ecological notion of resilience has been adopted by different Western theoretical approaches in a wide range of scientific fields from economics to political studies. Canadian ecologist С. Holling defines resilience as a measure of the persistence of systems and of their ability to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gleb V. Kotsur
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Volgograd State University 2018-12-01
Series:Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1830
id doaj-9a9eb224de114c1ebcd336c5ccc74034
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a9eb224de114c1ebcd336c5ccc740342020-11-24T20:41:25ZrusVolgograd State UniversityVestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ1998-99382312-87042018-12-0123615416310.15688/jvolsu4.2018.6.12Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017Gleb V. Kotsur0Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russian FederationIntroduction.The ecological notion of resilience has been adopted by different Western theoretical approaches in a wide range of scientific fields from economics to political studies. Canadian ecologist С. Holling defines resilience as a measure of the persistence of systems and of their ability to absorb change and disturbance (dynamic part) and still maintain the same relationships between populations or state variable (static part). The aim of this article is to identify the role of the dynamic dimension in strengthening resilience of British society during the period between the two London terrorist attacks of 2005 and 2017. Methods. The methodology of the paper is based on the discourse analysis of the key British documents on public security and the Internet publications immediately after the tragedy. Considering the theoretical aspect, the author distinguishes ‘the bouncing back’ approach (emphasizing static dimension), ‘complexity’ (dynamic) and ‘adaptive cycles’ being a middle ground. Analysis. Analysis of the key British security documents has shown that the government policy on strengthening resilience failed as it was characterized by an excessive predominance of the static element over the dynamic one. However, during the crisis, the London society managed to respond through specific set of adaptation measures such as grassroots self-organization through social networks, strategies of normalization and the phenomenon of habituation. Results. Results of this paper can be summarized in the following points: D. Chandler’s concept of ‘complexity’ has the significant potential for understanding the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies and ensuring public security. Russia, also facing the threat of international terrorism, should take into account the negative experience of British colleagues and avoid underestimating the preventive dimension of strengthening resilience.https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1830resilienceinternational terrorismfight against terrorpublic securityinternational securitysocio-ecological systems
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gleb V. Kotsur
spellingShingle Gleb V. Kotsur
Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
resilience
international terrorism
fight against terror
public security
international security
socio-ecological systems
author_facet Gleb V. Kotsur
author_sort Gleb V. Kotsur
title Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
title_short Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
title_full Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
title_fullStr Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
title_full_unstemmed Inclusion and Implementation of the Dynamic Dimension in the Process of Strengthening Resilience of Society: the Case of the London Terrorist Attacks of 2005 and 2017
title_sort inclusion and implementation of the dynamic dimension in the process of strengthening resilience of society: the case of the london terrorist attacks of 2005 and 2017
publisher Volgograd State University
series Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 4. Istoriâ, Regionovedenie, Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ
issn 1998-9938
2312-8704
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Introduction.The ecological notion of resilience has been adopted by different Western theoretical approaches in a wide range of scientific fields from economics to political studies. Canadian ecologist С. Holling defines resilience as a measure of the persistence of systems and of their ability to absorb change and disturbance (dynamic part) and still maintain the same relationships between populations or state variable (static part). The aim of this article is to identify the role of the dynamic dimension in strengthening resilience of British society during the period between the two London terrorist attacks of 2005 and 2017. Methods. The methodology of the paper is based on the discourse analysis of the key British documents on public security and the Internet publications immediately after the tragedy. Considering the theoretical aspect, the author distinguishes ‘the bouncing back’ approach (emphasizing static dimension), ‘complexity’ (dynamic) and ‘adaptive cycles’ being a middle ground. Analysis. Analysis of the key British security documents has shown that the government policy on strengthening resilience failed as it was characterized by an excessive predominance of the static element over the dynamic one. However, during the crisis, the London society managed to respond through specific set of adaptation measures such as grassroots self-organization through social networks, strategies of normalization and the phenomenon of habituation. Results. Results of this paper can be summarized in the following points: D. Chandler’s concept of ‘complexity’ has the significant potential for understanding the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies and ensuring public security. Russia, also facing the threat of international terrorism, should take into account the negative experience of British colleagues and avoid underestimating the preventive dimension of strengthening resilience.
topic resilience
international terrorism
fight against terror
public security
international security
socio-ecological systems
url https://hfrir.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/1830
work_keys_str_mv AT glebvkotsur inclusionandimplementationofthedynamicdimensionintheprocessofstrengtheningresilienceofsocietythecaseofthelondonterroristattacksof2005and2017
_version_ 1716825250454306816