Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy

Background/Aim. Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analog that mimics normal basal insulin secretion without pronounced peaks. The aim of this study was to compare insulin glargine with isophane insulin (NPH insulin) for basal insulin supply in patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods. A total...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pešić Milica, Živić Saša, Radenković Saša, Velojić Milena, Dimić Dragan, Antić Slobodan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Military Health Department, Ministry of Defance, Serbia 2007-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2007/0042-84500704247P.pdf
id doaj-9af30e75649d4798a82a0d2411291b9a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9af30e75649d4798a82a0d2411291b9a2020-11-24T23:42:28ZengMilitary Health Department, Ministry of Defance, SerbiaVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502007-01-0164424725210.2298/VSP0704247PComparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapyPešić MilicaŽivić SašaRadenković SašaVelojić MilenaDimić DraganAntić SlobodanBackground/Aim. Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analog that mimics normal basal insulin secretion without pronounced peaks. The aim of this study was to compare insulin glargine with isophane insulin (NPH insulin) for basal insulin supply in patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods. A total of 48 type 1 diabetics on long term conventional intensive insulin therapy (IIT) were randomized to three different regimens of basal insulin substitution: 1. continuation of NPH insulin once daily at bedtime with more intensive selfmonitoring (n = 15); 2. NPH insulin twice daily (n = 15); 3. insulin glargine once daily (n = 18). Meal time insulin aspart was continued in all groups. Results. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was lower in the glargine group (7.30±0.98 mmol/l) than in the twice daily NPH group (7.47±1.06 mmol/l), but without significant difference. FBG was significantly higher in the once daily NPH group (8.44±0.85 mmol/l; p < 0.05). HbA1c after 3 months did not change in the once daily NPH group, but decreased in the glargine group (from 7.72±0.86% to 6.87±0.50%), as well as in the twice daily NPH group (from 7.80±0.83% to 7.01±0.63%). Total daily insulin doses were similar in all groups but only in the glargine group there was an increase of basal and decrease of meal related insulin doses. The frequency of mild hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the glargine group (6.56±2.09) than in both NPH groups (9.0±1.65 in twice daily NPH group and 8.13±1.30 in other NPH group) (episodes/patients-month, p < 0.05). Conclusion. Basal insulin supplementation in type 1 diabetes mellitus with either twice daily NPH insulin or glargine can result in similar glycemic control when combined with meal time insulin aspart. However, with glargine regimen FBG, HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycemic event are lower. These facts contribute to better patients satisfaction with insulin glargine versus NPH insulin in IIT in type 1 diabetics.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2007/0042-84500704247P.pdfdiabetes mellitustype 1drug therapyhypoglycemicagentsinsulintreatment outcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pešić Milica
Živić Saša
Radenković Saša
Velojić Milena
Dimić Dragan
Antić Slobodan
spellingShingle Pešić Milica
Živić Saša
Radenković Saša
Velojić Milena
Dimić Dragan
Antić Slobodan
Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
diabetes mellitus
type 1
drug therapy
hypoglycemicagents
insulin
treatment outcome
author_facet Pešić Milica
Živić Saša
Radenković Saša
Velojić Milena
Dimić Dragan
Antić Slobodan
author_sort Pešić Milica
title Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
title_short Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
title_full Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
title_fullStr Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between basal insulin glargine and NPH insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
title_sort comparison between basal insulin glargine and nph insulin in patients with diabetes type 1 on conventional intensive insulin therapy
publisher Military Health Department, Ministry of Defance, Serbia
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
issn 0042-8450
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Background/Aim. Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analog that mimics normal basal insulin secretion without pronounced peaks. The aim of this study was to compare insulin glargine with isophane insulin (NPH insulin) for basal insulin supply in patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods. A total of 48 type 1 diabetics on long term conventional intensive insulin therapy (IIT) were randomized to three different regimens of basal insulin substitution: 1. continuation of NPH insulin once daily at bedtime with more intensive selfmonitoring (n = 15); 2. NPH insulin twice daily (n = 15); 3. insulin glargine once daily (n = 18). Meal time insulin aspart was continued in all groups. Results. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) was lower in the glargine group (7.30±0.98 mmol/l) than in the twice daily NPH group (7.47±1.06 mmol/l), but without significant difference. FBG was significantly higher in the once daily NPH group (8.44±0.85 mmol/l; p < 0.05). HbA1c after 3 months did not change in the once daily NPH group, but decreased in the glargine group (from 7.72±0.86% to 6.87±0.50%), as well as in the twice daily NPH group (from 7.80±0.83% to 7.01±0.63%). Total daily insulin doses were similar in all groups but only in the glargine group there was an increase of basal and decrease of meal related insulin doses. The frequency of mild hypoglycemia was significantly lower in the glargine group (6.56±2.09) than in both NPH groups (9.0±1.65 in twice daily NPH group and 8.13±1.30 in other NPH group) (episodes/patients-month, p < 0.05). Conclusion. Basal insulin supplementation in type 1 diabetes mellitus with either twice daily NPH insulin or glargine can result in similar glycemic control when combined with meal time insulin aspart. However, with glargine regimen FBG, HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycemic event are lower. These facts contribute to better patients satisfaction with insulin glargine versus NPH insulin in IIT in type 1 diabetics.
topic diabetes mellitus
type 1
drug therapy
hypoglycemicagents
insulin
treatment outcome
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2007/0042-84500704247P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pesicmilica comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
AT zivicsasa comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
AT radenkovicsasa comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
AT velojicmilena comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
AT dimicdragan comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
AT anticslobodan comparisonbetweenbasalinsulinglargineandnphinsulininpatientswithdiabetestype1onconventionalintensiveinsulintherapy
_version_ 1725504446998249472