The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism

Since 9/11 counter-terrorism laws adopted by Western democracies have been criticised intensively, producing a large body of theoretical and practical analysis. However, the material focusing on these issues through the lens of racism is limited. Thus the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Can Öztaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2011-04-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.168/
id doaj-9b015d1ceed243cdb0ec020564285353
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b015d1ceed243cdb0ec0205642853532020-11-25T01:22:00ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2011-04-017218019110.18352/ulr.168163The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorismCan ÖztaşSince 9/11 counter-terrorism laws adopted by Western democracies have been criticised intensively, producing a large body of theoretical and practical analysis. However, the material focusing on these issues through the lens of racism is limited. Thus the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism laws remain inadequate. One of the more obvious reasons for this gap in the literature is that the discriminatory dimension of counter-terrorism policies and laws and the subtle (sometimes institutional) racism involved is not adequately considered. Another reason is related to the dilemmatic role of human rights. Since early modernity the legal system and the values of Europe/the West is imposed on the 'other'. Previously this was done through colonialism and empire building; today, it is realised through the liberal capitalist economic system heralding democratic government based on 'universal' human rights. Like before, the 'other' resist this imposition (along with the democratic system based on human rights), through a vaguely defined term - 'terrorism'. In reaction, counter-terrorism measures and laws, which are known to violate human rights, are enacted in defence of a system which defines itself through a commitment to human rights values. This paper intends to discuss the dual role of human rights, which criticise and affirm counter-terrorism measures.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.168/human rightsterrorismcounter-terrorismracismcritical race theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Can Öztaş
spellingShingle Can Öztaş
The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
Utrecht Law Review
human rights
terrorism
counter-terrorism
racism
critical race theory
author_facet Can Öztaş
author_sort Can Öztaş
title The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
title_short The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
title_full The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
title_fullStr The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
title_full_unstemmed The march of the Mehteran<br>Rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
title_sort march of the mehteran<br>rethinking the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Since 9/11 counter-terrorism laws adopted by Western democracies have been criticised intensively, producing a large body of theoretical and practical analysis. However, the material focusing on these issues through the lens of racism is limited. Thus the human rights critiques of counter-terrorism laws remain inadequate. One of the more obvious reasons for this gap in the literature is that the discriminatory dimension of counter-terrorism policies and laws and the subtle (sometimes institutional) racism involved is not adequately considered. Another reason is related to the dilemmatic role of human rights. Since early modernity the legal system and the values of Europe/the West is imposed on the 'other'. Previously this was done through colonialism and empire building; today, it is realised through the liberal capitalist economic system heralding democratic government based on 'universal' human rights. Like before, the 'other' resist this imposition (along with the democratic system based on human rights), through a vaguely defined term - 'terrorism'. In reaction, counter-terrorism measures and laws, which are known to violate human rights, are enacted in defence of a system which defines itself through a commitment to human rights values. This paper intends to discuss the dual role of human rights, which criticise and affirm counter-terrorism measures.
topic human rights
terrorism
counter-terrorism
racism
critical race theory
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.168/
work_keys_str_mv AT canoztas themarchofthemehteranltbrgtrethinkingthehumanrightscritiquesofcounterterrorism
AT canoztas marchofthemehteranltbrgtrethinkingthehumanrightscritiquesofcounterterrorism
_version_ 1725128389149327360