Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits

Purpose. To compare the acute toxicities of IMRT to 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods and Materials. Eighty-six patients with rectal cancer preoperatively treated with IMRT (n=30) and 3DCRT (n=56) were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of acute toxicity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salma K. Jabbour, Shyamal Patel, Joseph M. Herman, Aaron Wild, Suneel N. Nagda, Taghrid Altoos, Ahmet Tunceroglu, Nilofer Azad, Susan Gearheart, Rebecca A. Moss, Elizabeth Poplin, Lydia L. Levinson, Ravi A. Chandra, Dirk F. Moore, Chunxia Chen, Bruce G. Haffty, Richard Tuli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Surgical Oncology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/891067
id doaj-9b066ea233cd4b21807fc6aa900225d6
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Salma K. Jabbour
Shyamal Patel
Joseph M. Herman
Aaron Wild
Suneel N. Nagda
Taghrid Altoos
Ahmet Tunceroglu
Nilofer Azad
Susan Gearheart
Rebecca A. Moss
Elizabeth Poplin
Lydia L. Levinson
Ravi A. Chandra
Dirk F. Moore
Chunxia Chen
Bruce G. Haffty
Richard Tuli
spellingShingle Salma K. Jabbour
Shyamal Patel
Joseph M. Herman
Aaron Wild
Suneel N. Nagda
Taghrid Altoos
Ahmet Tunceroglu
Nilofer Azad
Susan Gearheart
Rebecca A. Moss
Elizabeth Poplin
Lydia L. Levinson
Ravi A. Chandra
Dirk F. Moore
Chunxia Chen
Bruce G. Haffty
Richard Tuli
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
International Journal of Surgical Oncology
author_facet Salma K. Jabbour
Shyamal Patel
Joseph M. Herman
Aaron Wild
Suneel N. Nagda
Taghrid Altoos
Ahmet Tunceroglu
Nilofer Azad
Susan Gearheart
Rebecca A. Moss
Elizabeth Poplin
Lydia L. Levinson
Ravi A. Chandra
Dirk F. Moore
Chunxia Chen
Bruce G. Haffty
Richard Tuli
author_sort Salma K. Jabbour
title Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
title_short Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
title_full Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
title_fullStr Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
title_full_unstemmed Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department Visits
title_sort intensity-modulated radiation therapy for rectal carcinoma can reduce treatment breaks and emergency department visits
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 2090-1402
2090-1410
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Purpose. To compare the acute toxicities of IMRT to 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods and Materials. Eighty-six patients with rectal cancer preoperatively treated with IMRT (n=30) and 3DCRT (n=56) were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of acute toxicity between IMRT and 3DCRT were compared for anorexia, dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, radiation dermatitis, fatigue, pain, urinary frequency, and blood counts. Fisher's exact test and chi-square analysis were applied to detect statistical differences in incidences of toxicity between these two groups of patients. Results. There were fewer hospitalizations and emergency department visits in the group treated with IMRT compared with 3DCRT (P=0.005) and no treatment breaks with IMRT compared to 20% with 3DCRT (P=0.0002). Patients treated with IMRT had a significant reduction in grade ≥3 toxicities versus grade ≤2 toxicities (P=0.016) when compared to 3DCRT. The incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea was 9% among 3DCRT patients compared to 3% among IMRT patients (P=0.31). Conclusions. IMRT for rectal cancer can reduce treatment breaks, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and all grade ≥3 toxicities compared to 3DCRT. Further evaluation and followup is warranted to determine late toxicities and long-term results of IMRT.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/891067
work_keys_str_mv AT salmakjabbour intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT shyamalpatel intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT josephmherman intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT aaronwild intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT suneelnnagda intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT taghridaltoos intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT ahmettunceroglu intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT niloferazad intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT susangearheart intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT rebeccaamoss intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT elizabethpoplin intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT lydiallevinson intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT raviachandra intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT dirkfmoore intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT chunxiachen intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT bruceghaffty intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
AT richardtuli intensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforrectalcarcinomacanreducetreatmentbreaksandemergencydepartmentvisits
_version_ 1725575815140212736
spelling doaj-9b066ea233cd4b21807fc6aa900225d62020-11-24T23:20:08ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Surgical Oncology2090-14022090-14102012-01-01201210.1155/2012/891067891067Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Rectal Carcinoma Can Reduce Treatment Breaks and Emergency Department VisitsSalma K. Jabbour0Shyamal Patel1Joseph M. Herman2Aaron Wild3Suneel N. Nagda4Taghrid Altoos5Ahmet Tunceroglu6Nilofer Azad7Susan Gearheart8Rebecca A. Moss9Elizabeth Poplin10Lydia L. Levinson11Ravi A. Chandra12Dirk F. Moore13Chunxia Chen14Bruce G. Haffty15Richard Tuli16Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, New York, NY 10467, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Maywood, IL 60153, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Maywood, IL 60153, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USADepartment of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USADivision of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADivision of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USADepartment of Biostatistics, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Biostatistics, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USAPurpose. To compare the acute toxicities of IMRT to 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods and Materials. Eighty-six patients with rectal cancer preoperatively treated with IMRT (n=30) and 3DCRT (n=56) were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of acute toxicity between IMRT and 3DCRT were compared for anorexia, dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, radiation dermatitis, fatigue, pain, urinary frequency, and blood counts. Fisher's exact test and chi-square analysis were applied to detect statistical differences in incidences of toxicity between these two groups of patients. Results. There were fewer hospitalizations and emergency department visits in the group treated with IMRT compared with 3DCRT (P=0.005) and no treatment breaks with IMRT compared to 20% with 3DCRT (P=0.0002). Patients treated with IMRT had a significant reduction in grade ≥3 toxicities versus grade ≤2 toxicities (P=0.016) when compared to 3DCRT. The incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea was 9% among 3DCRT patients compared to 3% among IMRT patients (P=0.31). Conclusions. IMRT for rectal cancer can reduce treatment breaks, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and all grade ≥3 toxicities compared to 3DCRT. Further evaluation and followup is warranted to determine late toxicities and long-term results of IMRT.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/891067