Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.

In all tetrapods examined thus far, the development and patterning of limbs require the activation of gene members of the HoxD cluster. In mammals, they are regulated by a complex bimodal process that controls first the proximal patterning and then the distal structure. During the shift from the for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui, Lucille Lopez-Delisle, Christopher Chase Bolt, Guillaume Andrey, Leonardo Beccari, Denis Duboule
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-11-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000004
id doaj-9b1719bd932d4fb380472a66623e0974
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b1719bd932d4fb380472a66623e09742021-07-02T16:27:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852018-11-011611e300000410.1371/journal.pbio.3000004Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.Nayuta Yakushiji-KaminatsuiLucille Lopez-DelisleChristopher Chase BoltGuillaume AndreyLeonardo BeccariDenis DubouleIn all tetrapods examined thus far, the development and patterning of limbs require the activation of gene members of the HoxD cluster. In mammals, they are regulated by a complex bimodal process that controls first the proximal patterning and then the distal structure. During the shift from the former to the latter regulation, this bimodal regulatory mechanism allows the production of a domain with low Hoxd gene expression, at which both telomeric (T-DOM) and centromeric regulatory domains (C-DOM) are silent. These cells generate the future wrist and ankle articulations. We analyzed the implementation of this regulatory mechanism in chicken, i.e., in an animal for which large morphological differences exist between fore- and hindlimbs. We report that although this bimodal regulation is globally conserved between the mouse and the chick, some important modifications evolved at least between these two model systems, in particular regarding the activity of specific enhancers, the width of the TAD boundary separating the two regulations, and the comparison between the forelimb versus hindlimb regulatory controls. At least one aspect of these regulations seems to be more conserved between chick and bats than with mouse, which may relate to the extent to which forelimbs and hindlimbs of these various animals differ in their morphologies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui
Lucille Lopez-Delisle
Christopher Chase Bolt
Guillaume Andrey
Leonardo Beccari
Denis Duboule
spellingShingle Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui
Lucille Lopez-Delisle
Christopher Chase Bolt
Guillaume Andrey
Leonardo Beccari
Denis Duboule
Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui
Lucille Lopez-Delisle
Christopher Chase Bolt
Guillaume Andrey
Leonardo Beccari
Denis Duboule
author_sort Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui
title Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
title_short Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
title_full Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
title_fullStr Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
title_full_unstemmed Similarities and differences in the regulation of HoxD genes during chick and mouse limb development.
title_sort similarities and differences in the regulation of hoxd genes during chick and mouse limb development.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2018-11-01
description In all tetrapods examined thus far, the development and patterning of limbs require the activation of gene members of the HoxD cluster. In mammals, they are regulated by a complex bimodal process that controls first the proximal patterning and then the distal structure. During the shift from the former to the latter regulation, this bimodal regulatory mechanism allows the production of a domain with low Hoxd gene expression, at which both telomeric (T-DOM) and centromeric regulatory domains (C-DOM) are silent. These cells generate the future wrist and ankle articulations. We analyzed the implementation of this regulatory mechanism in chicken, i.e., in an animal for which large morphological differences exist between fore- and hindlimbs. We report that although this bimodal regulation is globally conserved between the mouse and the chick, some important modifications evolved at least between these two model systems, in particular regarding the activity of specific enhancers, the width of the TAD boundary separating the two regulations, and the comparison between the forelimb versus hindlimb regulatory controls. At least one aspect of these regulations seems to be more conserved between chick and bats than with mouse, which may relate to the extent to which forelimbs and hindlimbs of these various animals differ in their morphologies.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000004
work_keys_str_mv AT nayutayakushijikaminatsui similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
AT lucillelopezdelisle similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
AT christopherchasebolt similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
AT guillaumeandrey similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
AT leonardobeccari similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
AT denisduboule similaritiesanddifferencesintheregulationofhoxdgenesduringchickandmouselimbdevelopment
_version_ 1721326710516875264