Surveillance of surgical site infections: methodical comparison of the IQTIG and KISS strategies

• Main Authors: Rittmeier, Sascha, Waeschle, Reiner M., Artelt, Tanja, Fehling, Patrick, Suckow, Arnt, Siess, Martin, Scheithauer, Simone
• Format: Article
• Language: deu
• Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2021-05-01
• Series: GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
• Subjects: surgical wound; surgical wound infection; infection surveillance; iqtig; kiss
• Online Access: http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/dgkh/2021-16/dgkh000389.shtml

Aim: In 2017, the Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG) introduced a quality assurance system for the surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) on behalf the Federal Joint Committee. The establishment of the new system was made in parallel to existing methods, such as the “Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System” (KISS). The aim of this work was to perform a comparative analysis.Methods: All 2,233 cases at the University Medical Center Goettingen requiring an assessment of the presence of SSI as part of the IQTIG procedure in 2018 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively according to the KISS protocol.Results: In total, 2,050 patients were included in the comparative evaluation. Overall, 1,779 (79.7%) had a surgical anamnesis (surgery during the stay or in the past), and 1,716 (83.7%) showed identical results for both surveillance strategies. Different results were found for 334 patients (16.3%), with 160 of these (7.8%) positive for SSI according to IQTIG and 174 (8.5%) positive for KISS. Risk factors were identified for a discordant assessment between the methods. Conclusion: The congruence of the two strategies was consistently high over the study period. There is evidence that the efficiency of the documentation algorithm can be increased without the loss of documentation of SSI, while preserving the precision of the documentation through training.