Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading

This paper presents experimental results from shaking table tests on two reduced-scale geogrid reinforced soil-retaining walls (RSRWs) constructed using standard soil, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement to investigate the distribution of the geogrid strain and the mode of pote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sihan Li, Xiaoguang Cai, Liping Jing, Honglu Xu, Xin Huang, Chen Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8864256
id doaj-9b6a0ea0c51b4edba33bc13c23384c0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b6a0ea0c51b4edba33bc13c23384c0c2020-11-25T04:03:27ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1875-92032020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88642568864256Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic LoadingSihan Li0Xiaoguang Cai1Liping Jing2Honglu Xu3Xin Huang4Chen Zhu5Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering VibrationCollege of Geological EngineeringKey Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering VibrationCollege of Geological EngineeringKey Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering VibrationCollege of Geological EngineeringThis paper presents experimental results from shaking table tests on two reduced-scale geogrid reinforced soil-retaining walls (RSRWs) constructed using standard soil, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement to investigate the distribution of the geogrid strain and the mode of potential failure surface for dynamic loading conditions. Similitude relationships for shaking table tests in a 1 g gravitational field were used to scale the specimen geometry, applied characteristics of the earthquake motions. The lateral displacement of the top model is sufficiently large for the top-model block to fall down, and the RSRW is thus destroyed. The tensile strain at the lower part is greater than that at the upper part of the RSRW. The tensile strain in different layers for two-tiered RSRW is consistent with single-step RSRW. On comparing the measured maximum tensile strain lines of the geogrid with the result of the existing calculation method of the potential failure surface, it can be observed that the existing partial calculation method is conservative. Based on the calculation methods of various potential failure surfaces and the measured data, the use of a two-tiered fold-line failure surface is proposed for the two-tiered RSRW while taking into consideration the width of the platform. And it is advised that the failure surface calculation method of BS8006 be used as the calculation method for the potential failure surface of the single-step RSRW under dynamic motion.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8864256
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sihan Li
Xiaoguang Cai
Liping Jing
Honglu Xu
Xin Huang
Chen Zhu
spellingShingle Sihan Li
Xiaoguang Cai
Liping Jing
Honglu Xu
Xin Huang
Chen Zhu
Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
Shock and Vibration
author_facet Sihan Li
Xiaoguang Cai
Liping Jing
Honglu Xu
Xin Huang
Chen Zhu
author_sort Sihan Li
title Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
title_short Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
title_full Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
title_fullStr Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
title_full_unstemmed Reinforcement Strain and Potential Failure Surface of Geogrid Reinforced Soil-Retaining Wall under Horizontal Seismic Loading
title_sort reinforcement strain and potential failure surface of geogrid reinforced soil-retaining wall under horizontal seismic loading
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1875-9203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper presents experimental results from shaking table tests on two reduced-scale geogrid reinforced soil-retaining walls (RSRWs) constructed using standard soil, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement to investigate the distribution of the geogrid strain and the mode of potential failure surface for dynamic loading conditions. Similitude relationships for shaking table tests in a 1 g gravitational field were used to scale the specimen geometry, applied characteristics of the earthquake motions. The lateral displacement of the top model is sufficiently large for the top-model block to fall down, and the RSRW is thus destroyed. The tensile strain at the lower part is greater than that at the upper part of the RSRW. The tensile strain in different layers for two-tiered RSRW is consistent with single-step RSRW. On comparing the measured maximum tensile strain lines of the geogrid with the result of the existing calculation method of the potential failure surface, it can be observed that the existing partial calculation method is conservative. Based on the calculation methods of various potential failure surfaces and the measured data, the use of a two-tiered fold-line failure surface is proposed for the two-tiered RSRW while taking into consideration the width of the platform. And it is advised that the failure surface calculation method of BS8006 be used as the calculation method for the potential failure surface of the single-step RSRW under dynamic motion.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8864256
work_keys_str_mv AT sihanli reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
AT xiaoguangcai reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
AT lipingjing reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
AT hongluxu reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
AT xinhuang reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
AT chenzhu reinforcementstrainandpotentialfailuresurfaceofgeogridreinforcedsoilretainingwallunderhorizontalseismicloading
_version_ 1715058154034692096