Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Main Authors: Matteo Basilio Suter, Filippo Pesapane, Giorgio Maria Agazzi, Tania Gagliardi, Olga Nigro, Anna Bozzini, Francesca Priolo, Silvia Penco, Enrico Cassano, Claudio Chini, Alessandro Squizzato
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
• Series: Breast
• Subjects: Mammography; Breast neoplasms; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977620301326

Breast cancer diagnosis and staging is based on mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) has gained momentum as an innovative and clinically useful method for breast assessment. CESM is based on abnormal enhancement of neoplastic tissue compared to surrounding breast tissue. We performed a systematic review of prospective trial to evaluate its diagnostic performance, following standard PRISMA-DTA. We used a bivariate random-effects regression approach to obtain summary estimates of both sensitivity and specificity of CESM. 8 studies published between 2003 and 2019 were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 945 lesions. The summary area under the curve obtained from all the study was 89% [95% CI 86%–91%], with a sensitivity of 85% [95% CI 73%–93%], and a specificity of 77% [95% CI 60%–88%]. With a pre-test probability of malignancy of 57% a positive finding at CESM gives a post-test probability of 83% while a negative finding a post-test probability of 20%. CESM shows a suboptimal sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer in a selected population, and at present time, it could be considered only as a possible alternative test for breast lesions assessment when mammography and ultrasound are not conclusive or MRI is contraindicated or not available.