Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales

Traditional ‘terroir zoning’ has largely relied on heuristic ‘expert’ opinion coupled with approaches to land classification based on thematic mapping to describe the influence of soil conditions and climate on wine composition. Recent advances in geographical information systems (GIS) and digital...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert G. V. Bramley, Jackie Ouzman, Mike C.T. Trought
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Viticulture and Enology Society 2020-11-01
Series:OENO One
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/3858
id doaj-9b8411050a614ef8a3e444ce57b39e86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9b8411050a614ef8a3e444ce57b39e862021-04-02T13:23:36ZengInternational Viticulture and Enology SocietyOENO One2494-12712020-11-0154410.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3858Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scalesRobert G. V. Bramley0Jackie Ouzman1Mike C.T. Trought2Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization - CSIRO, Waite Campus, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064CSIRO, Waite Campus, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064Innovative Winegrowing, 9A Ward Street, Blenheim, 7201 Traditional ‘terroir zoning’ has largely relied on heuristic ‘expert’ opinion coupled with approaches to land classification based on thematic mapping to describe the influence of soil conditions and climate on wine composition. Recent advances in geographical information systems (GIS) and digital mapping have enabled more robust quantitative methods to be developed, but with few exceptions recent terroir research has remained reliant on heuristic opinion and conformity to previously defined terroir units, rather than employing data-driven approaches. Using two case studies at regional scale, the aim of this paper is to illustrate how the use of methods of quantitative spatial analysis, as used to guide understanding of production system variability and to underpin precision viticulture (PV), may assist in better understanding terroir at a range of scales. In the Barossa region of Australia, cluster analysis of indices of soil physical and chemical fertility (available water capacity and cation exchange capacity), with critical climate variables (growing season rainfall, mean January temperature and growing degree days), clearly delineates differences between the Barossa and Eden Valleys but does not robustly promote further sub-division. Meanwhile, in the Marlborough region of New Zealand, interpolation of data supplied by wine companies from over 450 vineyards over several seasons suggests a consistent and characteristic regional ‘terroir’ in terms of vine yield and harvest date. Similarly consistent results were obtained for sub-regions of the Wairau Valley and a comparison of the Wairau and Awatere valleys. Thus, with scale-dependent modification, the methods of spatial analysis used to underpin PV and studies of within-vineyard variability offer much potential for terroir analysis and the identification of terroir zones. Importantly, these methods are unbiased, data-driven, and not reliant on heuristic opinion. https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/3858vineyard variabilityspatial analysisvineyard zoning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert G. V. Bramley
Jackie Ouzman
Mike C.T. Trought
spellingShingle Robert G. V. Bramley
Jackie Ouzman
Mike C.T. Trought
Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
OENO One
vineyard variability
spatial analysis
vineyard zoning
author_facet Robert G. V. Bramley
Jackie Ouzman
Mike C.T. Trought
author_sort Robert G. V. Bramley
title Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
title_short Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
title_full Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
title_fullStr Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
title_full_unstemmed Making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
title_sort making sense of a sense of place: precision viticulture approaches to the analysis of terroir at different scales
publisher International Viticulture and Enology Society
series OENO One
issn 2494-1271
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Traditional ‘terroir zoning’ has largely relied on heuristic ‘expert’ opinion coupled with approaches to land classification based on thematic mapping to describe the influence of soil conditions and climate on wine composition. Recent advances in geographical information systems (GIS) and digital mapping have enabled more robust quantitative methods to be developed, but with few exceptions recent terroir research has remained reliant on heuristic opinion and conformity to previously defined terroir units, rather than employing data-driven approaches. Using two case studies at regional scale, the aim of this paper is to illustrate how the use of methods of quantitative spatial analysis, as used to guide understanding of production system variability and to underpin precision viticulture (PV), may assist in better understanding terroir at a range of scales. In the Barossa region of Australia, cluster analysis of indices of soil physical and chemical fertility (available water capacity and cation exchange capacity), with critical climate variables (growing season rainfall, mean January temperature and growing degree days), clearly delineates differences between the Barossa and Eden Valleys but does not robustly promote further sub-division. Meanwhile, in the Marlborough region of New Zealand, interpolation of data supplied by wine companies from over 450 vineyards over several seasons suggests a consistent and characteristic regional ‘terroir’ in terms of vine yield and harvest date. Similarly consistent results were obtained for sub-regions of the Wairau Valley and a comparison of the Wairau and Awatere valleys. Thus, with scale-dependent modification, the methods of spatial analysis used to underpin PV and studies of within-vineyard variability offer much potential for terroir analysis and the identification of terroir zones. Importantly, these methods are unbiased, data-driven, and not reliant on heuristic opinion.
topic vineyard variability
spatial analysis
vineyard zoning
url https://oeno-one.eu/article/view/3858
work_keys_str_mv AT robertgvbramley makingsenseofasenseofplaceprecisionviticultureapproachestotheanalysisofterroiratdifferentscales
AT jackieouzman makingsenseofasenseofplaceprecisionviticultureapproachestotheanalysisofterroiratdifferentscales
AT mikecttrought makingsenseofasenseofplaceprecisionviticultureapproachestotheanalysisofterroiratdifferentscales
_version_ 1721565279125766144